baseline: the published sim-numerics artifact as it stands (490 tests, verify_article.py checks all 72 paper numbers against sweep_full.json)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
vvs
2026-09-20 22:38:17 +01:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
commit 4a23aacf96
75 changed files with 12175 additions and 0 deletions
+107
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
"""Pins the regime findings of stage 7.
Three conclusions were drawn from that analysis and used to decide what to do
next. Each is asserted here so that a re-run of the sweep which moves them
fails the build instead of quietly invalidating the conclusion.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import os
import sys
import pytest
ROOT = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))
sys.path.insert(0, ROOT)
SWEEP = os.path.join(ROOT, "sweep_full.json")
pytestmark = pytest.mark.skipif(not os.path.exists(SWEEP),
reason="sweep_full.json not present")
SCALES = ("start", "bracket", "derived", "derived3")
MAXFEV = 200
def load():
with open(SWEEP, encoding="utf8") as fh:
return {r["label"]: r for r in json.load(fh)}
def cost(rows, sim, scale, pid):
r = rows[f"pure.{sim}.{scale}.project"]
d = r["APS"]["per"].get(pid) or r["CHA"]["per"].get(pid)
return d[0] if d[1] else MAXFEV
def all_pids(rows):
r = rows["pure.ratio.derived3.project"]
return list(r["APS"]["per"]) + list(r["CHA"]["per"])
def test_the_scale_axis_has_little_headroom():
"""5.3%. If this ever grows a lot, the scale is worth revisiting; as it
stands it is not where the regimes live."""
rows = load()
pids = all_pids(rows)
ours = sum(cost(rows, "ratio", "derived3", p) for p in pids)
oracle = sum(min(cost(rows, "ratio", s, p) for s in SCALES) for p in pids)
head = (ours - oracle) / ours
assert 0.0 <= head < 0.10, head
def test_cbrt_beats_us_consistently_on_the_fun4_family():
"""The signature of a real regime rather than luck: the same function at
five different parameters all prefer the same similarity, by a wide
margin. This is the finding that keeps the line open."""
rows = load()
fam = [f"fun4.{i}" for i in range(1, 6)]
better = 0
for pid in fam:
ours = cost(rows, "ratio", "derived3", pid)
cb = cost(rows, "cbrt", "derived3", pid)
if cb < ours:
better += 1
assert better == 5, f"only {better}/5 of the fun4 family prefer cbrt"
tot_ours = sum(cost(rows, "ratio", "derived3", p) for p in fam)
tot_cb = sum(cost(rows, "cbrt", "derived3", p) for p in fam)
assert tot_cb < 0.6 * tot_ours, (tot_cb, tot_ours)
def test_switching_by_benchmark_set_is_worse_than_not_switching():
"""The finding that closed the obvious exploit: cbrt wins the fun3/4/5
families but loses the rest of Chandrupatla, so a set-level switch costs
more than a single fixed choice. Any future 'regime' proposal has to beat
this, not merely beat one family."""
rows = load()
single = (rows["pure.ratio.derived3.project"]["APS"]["total"]
+ rows["pure.ratio.derived3.project"]["CHA"]["total"])
switched = (rows["pure.ratio.derived3.project"]["APS"]["total"]
+ rows["pure.cbrt.derived3.project"]["CHA"]["total"])
assert switched > single, (switched, single)
def test_the_proposed_similarity_wins_most_problems_outright():
"""155 of 199. The per-problem oracle over similarities is an upper
bound on regime detection, not a method, and most of the field is already
ours without it."""
rows = load()
pids = all_pids(rows)
sims = ("ratio", "sqrt", "cbrt", "rational", "ratio_soft", "exp_abs",
"rat_sq", "exp_sq", "cosine")
wins = 0
for p in pids:
c = {s: cost(rows, s, "derived3", p) for s in sims}
if c["ratio"] == min(c.values()):
wins += 1
assert wins >= 150, wins
def test_stage7_runs():
"""The analysis script itself must still execute against the current
sweep file."""
import subprocess
r = subprocess.run([sys.executable, "stage7_regimes.py"], cwd=ROOT,
capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=600)
assert r.returncode == 0, r.stderr[-800:]
assert "SETTLING THE TWO SUSPICIONS" in r.stdout