PREREG_flat_creep outcome: NOT accepted. Unkept promise AND creep under the projection: APS 2806 -> 2878 (V2 fails), CHA 3220 -> 3354 (V1 fails), flat fun3-6 1823 -> 1991 (V4 fails), guarantee holds (V3). With G2: 2782 -> 2842, 3169 -> 3318. Under safe CHA 3390 -> 3149, weaker than the single flag (3037). None of the three flat-regime gates pays under the projection: its budget already does their work. Server regression x2: 952 passed, 1 failed = the expected paper-number check (46 numbers after the signfix, pending the paper decision).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
vvs
2026-09-21 13:55:37 +01:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 35eb9416d3
commit 5a1edffcfc
5 changed files with 77 additions and 4 deletions
+32
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
sweep: 140 configurations x 199 problems (FULL)
wrote sweep_flatcreep.json (8s total)
tent, 3-point, pairs (no gate -> flat gate) APS CHA both flat fun3-6
none 2806->2878 4104->3407 6910->6285 2707->2044 solved 193 over 9
none +G2 2782->2842 3863->3374 6645->6216 2474->1990 solved 193 over 9
step 3036->3099 3524->3149 6560->6248 2111->1748 solved 193 over 0
step +G2 3089->3074 3529->3182 6618->6256 2106->1770 solved 193 over 0
bracket 7260->7260 3604->3604 10864->10864 1730->1730 solved 193 over 0
bracket +G2 6837->6837 3650->3650 10487->10487 1717->1717 solved 193 over 0
both 7239->7209 3515->3515 10754->10724 1529->1529 solved 193 over 0
both +G2 7130->7130 3463->3463 10593->10593 1504->1504 solved 193 over 0
project 2806->2878 3220->3354 6026->6232 1823->1991 solved 193 over 0
project +G2 2782->2842 3169->3318 5951->6160 1780->1934 solved 193 over 0
safe 3036->3099 3390->3149 6426->6248 1977->1748 solved 193 over 0
safe +G2 3089->3074 3392->3182 6481->6256 1969->1770 solved 193 over 0
credit 3568->3625 3020->3040 6588->6665 1044->1064 solved 193 over 0
credit +G2 3799->3798 3064->3063 6863->6861 1044->1064 solved 193 over 0
VERDICTS
proposed rule APS 2806->2878 (Z2 ✗) CHA 3220->3354 (Z1 ✗) Z3 ✓ (0 viol, 0 cells <193) Z4 ✗ both 6232 vs Chandrupatla APS 78/27/48 p=0.0095 not accepted
proposed rule + G2 APS 2782->2842 (Z2 ✗) CHA 3169->3318 (Z1 ✗) Z3 ✓ (0 viol, 0 cells <193) Z4 ✗ both 6160 vs Chandrupatla APS 88/20/45 p=0.00024 not accepted
nine functions, projection, no gate -> flat gate, both sets:
cbrt 18003 -> 18131
cosine 19741 -> 18619
exp_abs 6652 -> 7038
exp_sq 19786 -> 16770
rat_sq 19793 -> 17399
ratio 6026 -> 6232
ratio_soft 9352 -> 9591
rational 6823 -> 7327
sqrt 13388 -> 13597