PREREG_half_contra outcome: ACCEPTED (server = smoke in every projection cell; 0 violations in the guaranteed family).
'half': the step promises the root in the half near x (S >= 1/2) while the bracket line puts it in the far half (smaller |f| at the far end) -> halve.
half alone APS 2806 -> 2564 (!) CHA 3220 -> 3202
G2 + contra + rem + point + exp + half APS 2773 -> 2559 CHA 2073 -> 2047 both 4606 (all of H1-H4; goal kept)
per problem vs Chandrupatla: APS 98/17/38 p=2.7e-7, CHA 27/6/7 p=8e-4
contra + rem + point + exp + half (no G2) APS 2551 CHA 2044 both 4595 (H2 fails by 24)
with defect it does not combine (APS 2531 -> 2651): the two refuse overlapping steps.
fun9: 77 -> 68 (Chandrupatla 55); fun9.5 24 -> 16.
Server regression x2: 1204 passed, 1 failed = the paper-number check.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ TOTALS (evaluations of f, failures charged 200)
|
||||
+ defect + rem. + ORDER POINT 2532 2164 4696
|
||||
+ G2 + contra + rem. + pt + EXP 2773 2073 4846
|
||||
+ defect + rem. + pt + EXP 2531 1972 4503
|
||||
+ half (alone) 2564 3202 5766
|
||||
+ G2 + contra + rem + pt + exp + HALF 2559 2047 4606
|
||||
+ contra + rem + pt + exp + HALF 2551 2044 4595
|
||||
Chandrupatla 2787 2441 5228
|
||||
Brent 2889 4115 7004
|
||||
TOMS748 2820 4000 6820
|
||||
@@ -26,6 +29,9 @@ PER PROBLEM, ours against each rival: wins/ties/losses (sign-test p)
|
||||
+ defect + rem. + ORDER POINT Chandrupatla 86/20/47 p=0.00091 Brent 101/12/40 p=2.9e-07 TOMS748 107/11/35 p=1.1e-09
|
||||
+ G2 + contra + rem. + pt + EXP Chandrupatla 98/18/37 p=1.5e-07 Brent 112/8/33 p=3e-11 TOMS748 98/15/40 p=8.5e-07
|
||||
+ defect + rem. + pt + EXP Chandrupatla 86/20/47 p=0.00091 Brent 101/12/40 p=2.9e-07 TOMS748 107/11/35 p=1.1e-09
|
||||
+ half (alone) Chandrupatla 98/18/37 p=1.5e-07 Brent 116/7/30 p=3.9e-13 TOMS748 117/9/27 p=1.5e-14
|
||||
+ G2 + contra + rem + pt + exp + HALF Chandrupatla 98/17/38 p=2.7e-07 Brent 114/8/31 p=2.3e-12 TOMS748 118/7/28 p=2.4e-14
|
||||
+ contra + rem + pt + exp + HALF Chandrupatla 99/16/38 p=1.9e-07 Brent 115/8/30 p=6.2e-13 TOMS748 117/8/28 p=3.9e-14
|
||||
CHA
|
||||
proposed rule Chandrupatla 9/5/26 p=0.006 Brent 30/4/4 p=6.2e-06 TOMS748 31/1/8 p=0.00029
|
||||
+ G2 (step pattern) Chandrupatla 10/3/27 p=0.0076 Brent 30/2/6 p=7e-05 TOMS748 31/1/8 p=0.00029
|
||||
@@ -37,6 +43,9 @@ PER PROBLEM, ours against each rival: wins/ties/losses (sign-test p)
|
||||
+ defect + rem. + ORDER POINT Chandrupatla 20/3/17 p=0.74 Brent 30/2/6 p=7e-05 TOMS748 34/1/5 p=2.4e-06
|
||||
+ G2 + contra + rem. + pt + EXP Chandrupatla 28/3/9 p=0.0026 Brent 31/3/4 p=3.5e-06 TOMS748 37/1/2 p=2.8e-09
|
||||
+ defect + rem. + pt + EXP Chandrupatla 27/3/10 p=0.0076 Brent 30/2/6 p=7e-05 TOMS748 35/1/4 p=3.4e-07
|
||||
+ half (alone) Chandrupatla 8/6/26 p=0.0029 Brent 33/3/2 p=3.7e-08 TOMS748 33/0/7 p=4.2e-05
|
||||
+ G2 + contra + rem + pt + exp + HALF Chandrupatla 27/6/7 p=0.00082 Brent 33/3/2 p=3.7e-08 TOMS748 38/1/1 p=1.5e-10
|
||||
+ contra + rem + pt + exp + HALF Chandrupatla 27/6/7 p=0.00082 Brent 34/4/0 p=1.2e-10 TOMS748 38/1/1 p=1.5e-10
|
||||
|
||||
CHA PER FAMILY (ours / Chandrupatla)
|
||||
fun1 fun2 fun3 fun4 fun5 fun6 fun7 fun8 fun9
|
||||
@@ -50,4 +59,7 @@ CHA PER FAMILY (ours / Chandrupatla)
|
||||
+ defect + rem. + ORDER POINT 99 144 132 141 177 339 1000 57 75
|
||||
+ G2 + contra + rem. + pt + EXP 98 146 147 158 208 187 1000 52 77
|
||||
+ defect + rem. + pt + EXP 100 144 123 146 161 167 1000 57 74
|
||||
+ half (alone) 106 141 353 548 452 456 1000 52 94
|
||||
+ G2 + contra + rem + pt + exp + HALF 98 147 147 173 208 154 1000 52 68
|
||||
+ contra + rem + pt + exp + HALF 103 141 145 173 208 154 1000 52 68
|
||||
Chandrupatla 103 152 305 297 233 233 1000 63 55
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user