  vvsandClaude Opus 5
|
be10fc0b22
|
explained, with numbers: Chandrupatla wins the probe by REFUSING its model cheaply, not by trusting it — it accepts the interpolation on only 28% of steps, its gate costs zero evaluations (read from data already in hand) and its refusal branch still halves the bracket; ours repairs 77.5% of evaluations after the fact and drops to 0.92 halvings/eval on fun8/fun9, worse than bisection. In similarity terms: their similarity is a PRE-step GATE on dimensionless ratios (a neighbourhood of the linear configuration), ours is an IN-step SCALE on the residual magnitude — the PLACEMENT of the reading matters more than its form
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
2026-09-20 23:05:22 +01:00 |
|