tent, three-point, pairs (without A -> with A): APS | CHA | both | flat fun3-6 sum defect credit 3545->4134 2949->2926 6494->7060 1044->993 solved 193 over 0 plain credit 3568->4130 3020->2986 6588->7116 1044->988 solved 193 over 0 dissim+slope credit 3857->4223 3002->2947 6859->7170 1043->1002 solved 193 over 0 slope credit 3507->4121 2997->3007 6504->7128 1051->1007 solved 193 over 0 shape+slope credit 3755->4169 3021->3059 6776->7228 1064->1064 solved 193 over 0 defect none 2523->3180 4198->3508 6721->6688 2806->2081 solved 188 over 1 plain none 2806->2967 4104->3471 6910->6438 2707->2070 solved 188 over 0 dissim+slope none 2726->2859 2785->2545 5511->5404 1376->1157 solved 193 over 0 slope none 2848->2971 3075->2735 5923->5706 1710->1331 solved 193 over 0 shape+slope none 2675->2930 5443->5452 8118->8382 4000->4000 solved 173 over 0 defect project 2523->3180 3210->2954 5733->6134 1818->1527 solved 193 over 0 plain project 2806->2967 3220->2925 6026->5892 1823->1524 solved 193 over 0 dissim+slope project 2726->2859 2785->2545 5511->5404 1376->1157 solved 193 over 0 slope project 2848->2971 3074->2735 5922->5706 1709->1331 solved 193 over 0 shape+slope project 2675->2930 3498->3506 6173->6436 2055->2054 solved 193 over 0 defect safe 3131->3207 3368->3386 6499->6593 1943->1929 solved 193 over 0 plain safe 3036->3171 3363->3389 6399->6560 1950->1931 solved 193 over 0 dissim+slope safe 3123->3170 2683->2710 5806->5880 1228->1248 solved 193 over 0 slope safe 3020->3187 2903->2895 5923->6082 1484->1469 solved 193 over 0 shape+slope safe 2527->2986 3108->3223 5635->6209 1629->1687 solved 193 over 0 VERDICTS for the proposed rule (tent, 3-point, projection) X1 CHA < 3220: 2925 -> PASS X2 APS <= 2806: 2967 -> FAIL X3 guarantee family with A: 0 violations over 39 cells; cells solving < 193: 0 -> PASS X4 flat fun3-6 sum: 1823 -> 1524 -> PASS X5 best pair with A over both sets: pure+dissim+ext+slope.ratio.derived3.project 2859+2545=5404 (reference 5511, Chandrupatla 5228) proposed + A vs Chandrupatla, APS: 42/62/49 sign p=0.53 totals 2967 vs 2787 proposed + A vs Chandrupatla, CHA: 11/1/28 sign p=0.0095 totals 2925 vs 2441 nine functions, three-point, projection, no readings (without A -> with A), both sets: cbrt 17993 -> 18181 cosine 19784 -> 19753 exp_abs 6652 -> 6869 exp_sq 19786 -> 19780 rat_sq 19793 -> 19796 ratio 6026 -> 5892 ratio_soft 9352 -> 9285 rational 6823 -> 7483 sqrt 13381 -> 13633