vvsandClaude Opus 5
08863c170c
Splitting in the flat regime at the point from the analogous pair's order (t = |FA|^(1/m) / (|FA|^(1/m) + |FB|^(1/m))) instead of the midpoint: G2 + analogy + order point APS 2780 CHA 2221 both 5001 (P1-P4 all hold; vs Chandrupatla 2787 / 2441 / 5228) G2 + contra + remembered + point APS 2775 CHA 2119 both 4894 (P3 fails by 2 against its midpoint twin) defect + remembered + point APS 2532 CHA 2164 both 4696 (P3 fails by 2) Flat fun3-6: 1234 -> 847 (analogy), 1151 -> 743 (remembered) - below pure bisection 1044 and Chandrupatla 1068. Per problem on the wide set vs Chandrupatla now 20-24 wins / 13-17 losses (p 0.1-0.7, not significant); on the canonical set the edge is kept (95/20/38 p=8e-7). Guarantee: 0 violations and >= 193 solved in every project/safe/credit cell. Server regression x2: 1150 passed, 1 failed = the paper-number check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
46 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext
46 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext
TOTALS (evaluations of f, failures charged 200)
|
|
method APS CHA both
|
|
proposed rule 2806 3220 6026
|
|
+ G2 (step pattern) 2782 3169 5951
|
|
+ G2 + analogy entry 2780 2625 5405
|
|
+ contra + remembered analogy 2792 2537 5329
|
|
+ defect + remembered analogy 2530 2561 5091
|
|
+ G2 + analogy + ORDER POINT 2780 2221 5001
|
|
+ G2 + contra + rem. + ORDER PT 2775 2119 4894
|
|
+ defect + rem. + ORDER POINT 2532 2164 4696
|
|
Chandrupatla 2787 2441 5228
|
|
Brent 2889 4115 7004
|
|
TOMS748 2820 4000 6820
|
|
|
|
PER PROBLEM, ours against each rival: wins/ties/losses (sign-test p)
|
|
APS
|
|
proposed rule Chandrupatla 87/24/42 p=9.2e-05 Brent 102/11/40 p=2e-07 TOMS748 86/16/51 p=0.0035
|
|
+ G2 (step pattern) Chandrupatla 95/20/38 p=8.2e-07 Brent 110/9/34 p=1.5e-10 TOMS748 97/15/41 p=2.1e-06
|
|
+ G2 + analogy entry Chandrupatla 95/20/38 p=8.2e-07 Brent 110/9/34 p=1.5e-10 TOMS748 97/15/41 p=2.1e-06
|
|
+ contra + remembered analogy Chandrupatla 90/23/40 p=1.4e-05 Brent 105/11/37 p=9.9e-09 TOMS748 87/16/50 p=0.002
|
|
+ defect + remembered analogy Chandrupatla 86/20/47 p=0.00091 Brent 101/13/39 p=1.6e-07 TOMS748 107/11/35 p=1.1e-09
|
|
+ G2 + analogy + ORDER POINT Chandrupatla 95/20/38 p=8.2e-07 Brent 110/9/34 p=1.5e-10 TOMS748 97/15/41 p=2.1e-06
|
|
+ G2 + contra + rem. + ORDER PT Chandrupatla 98/18/37 p=1.5e-07 Brent 112/8/33 p=3e-11 TOMS748 98/15/40 p=8.5e-07
|
|
+ defect + rem. + ORDER POINT Chandrupatla 86/20/47 p=0.00091 Brent 101/12/40 p=2.9e-07 TOMS748 107/11/35 p=1.1e-09
|
|
CHA
|
|
proposed rule Chandrupatla 9/5/26 p=0.006 Brent 30/4/4 p=6.2e-06 TOMS748 31/1/8 p=0.00029
|
|
+ G2 (step pattern) Chandrupatla 10/3/27 p=0.0076 Brent 30/2/6 p=7e-05 TOMS748 31/1/8 p=0.00029
|
|
+ G2 + analogy entry Chandrupatla 9/6/25 p=0.009 Brent 30/2/6 p=7e-05 TOMS748 36/1/3 p=3.6e-08
|
|
+ contra + remembered analogy Chandrupatla 8/7/25 p=0.0046 Brent 31/4/3 p=7.7e-07 TOMS748 37/1/2 p=2.8e-09
|
|
+ defect + remembered analogy Chandrupatla 8/5/27 p=0.0019 Brent 30/2/6 p=7e-05 TOMS748 35/1/4 p=3.4e-07
|
|
+ G2 + analogy + ORDER POINT Chandrupatla 24/3/13 p=0.099 Brent 30/2/6 p=7e-05 TOMS748 35/1/4 p=3.4e-07
|
|
+ G2 + contra + rem. + ORDER PT Chandrupatla 22/3/15 p=0.32 Brent 31/2/5 p=1.3e-05 TOMS748 36/1/3 p=3.6e-08
|
|
+ defect + rem. + ORDER POINT Chandrupatla 20/3/17 p=0.74 Brent 30/2/6 p=7e-05 TOMS748 34/1/5 p=2.4e-06
|
|
|
|
CHA PER FAMILY (ours / Chandrupatla)
|
|
fun1 fun2 fun3 fun4 fun5 fun6 fun7 fun8 fun9
|
|
proposed rule 99 141 338 573 456 456 1000 52 105
|
|
+ G2 (step pattern) 97 146 346 522 456 456 1000 52 94
|
|
+ G2 + analogy entry 99 146 336 331 254 313 1000 52 94
|
|
+ contra + remembered analogy 108 141 304 318 254 275 1000 52 85
|
|
+ defect + remembered analogy 123 144 304 315 257 280 1000 57 81
|
|
+ G2 + analogy + ORDER POINT 82 146 230 261 100 256 1000 52 94
|
|
+ G2 + contra + rem. + ORDER PT 94 146 144 143 252 208 1000 52 80
|
|
+ defect + rem. + ORDER POINT 99 144 132 141 177 339 1000 57 75
|
|
Chandrupatla 103 152 305 297 233 233 1000 63 55
|