vvsandClaude Opus 5
8830765454
Tables 2-3 regenerated from sweep_full.json by tables_for_md.py with the verifier's own ranking: Chandrupatla's method, missing from both, is FIRST on the canonical set (2785) and second on the wide-bracket set (2423); the proposed rule is 29th (3568) and 10th (3020); Brent 2889/4099 (was 2890/4101). The abstract, §5 text, §5.1, §5.2 (timed configuration named), §7 (records 2527/2523 are under the scheduled projection: 2523 flat for every multiplier 1.25-4, 2527 becomes 2541 at 1.25; under credit the readings give far less, best constant-free total 6494 by 'defect'), §8.4, §8.11 and the conclusion now say so: parity with the tuned methods at the price of one constant, or a constant-free rule with a tighter guarantee that trails on the canonical set. verify_article.py: 279 checks, measured tables recomputed from fresh runs; 762 tests pass twice. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
16 lines
750 B
Plaintext
16 lines
750 B
Plaintext
factor APS solved CHA solved both
|
|
1.00 4817 153/154 2997 40/45 7814
|
|
1.25 2806 153/154 2752 40/45 5558
|
|
1.50 2806 153/154 2889 40/45 5695
|
|
2.00 2806 153/154 3220 40/45 6026 <- the text's choice
|
|
3.00 2806 153/154 3756 40/45 6562
|
|
4.00 2806 153/154 4006 40/45 6812
|
|
credit 3568 153/154 3020 40/45 6588 <- no multiplier, bound = bisection + 1 step
|
|
|
|
C0 APS CHA both promise
|
|
0.10 5344 3051 8395 bisection + 1 step(s)
|
|
0.50 4656 3002 7658 bisection + 1 step(s)
|
|
1.00 3568 3020 6588 bisection + 1 step(s)
|
|
2.00 3692 2712 6404 bisection + 2 step(s)
|
|
5.00 3006 2615 5621 bisection + 5 step(s)
|