vvsandClaude Opus 5 5a1edffcfc PREREG_flat_creep outcome: NOT accepted. Unkept promise AND creep under the projection: APS 2806 -> 2878 (V2 fails), CHA 3220 -> 3354 (V1 fails), flat fun3-6 1823 -> 1991 (V4 fails), guarantee holds (V3). With G2: 2782 -> 2842, 3169 -> 3318. Under safe CHA 3390 -> 3149, weaker than the single flag (3037). None of the three flat-regime gates pays under the projection: its budget already does their work. Server regression x2: 952 passed, 1 failed = the expected paper-number check (46 numbers after the signfix, pending the paper decision). ...

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-09-21 13:55:37 +01:00

..

__init__.py

baseline: the published sim-numerics artifact as it stands (490 tests, verify_article.py checks all 72 paper numbers against sweep_full.json)

2026-09-20 22:38:17 +01:00

baselines.py

Sign tests by product underflowed: FIXED everywhere (branch, not master - the paper is not yet updated). FA * fnew < 0.0 with FA ~ -1e-200, fnew ~ 1e-150 is -0.0 and '-0.0 < 0.0' is False, so on flat functions (x^19) the bracket update moved the wrong end, the root left the bracket and the run still reported convergence - the proposed rule returned 4.9e-9, bisection 3.5e-9, ITP 1.6e-8 with a claimed 1e-12 bracket; the 1e-6 harness scored them solved. Same defect in our bisection, false-position family, Ridders, Brent, ITP and twelve copies in stage scripts, simroot/sim.py and one test; all replaced by _opposite / _same_sign, pinned by test_sign_underflow.

2026-09-21 12:49:01 +01:00

pure.py

PREREG_flat_creep outcome: NOT accepted. Unkept promise AND creep under the projection: APS 2806 -> 2878 (V2 fails), CHA 3220 -> 3354 (V1 fails), flat fun3-6 1823 -> 1991 (V4 fails), guarantee holds (V3). With G2: 2782 -> 2842, 3169 -> 3318. Under safe CHA 3390 -> 3149, weaker than the single flag (3037). None of the three flat-regime gates pays under the projection: its budget already does their work. Server regression x2: 952 passed, 1 failed = the expected paper-number check (46 numbers after the signfix, pending the paper decision).

2026-09-21 13:55:37 +01:00

sim.py

Sign tests by product underflowed: FIXED everywhere (branch, not master - the paper is not yet updated). FA * fnew < 0.0 with FA ~ -1e-200, fnew ~ 1e-150 is -0.0 and '-0.0 < 0.0' is False, so on flat functions (x^19) the bracket update moved the wrong end, the root left the bracket and the run still reported convergence - the proposed rule returned 4.9e-9, bisection 3.5e-9, ITP 1.6e-8 with a claimed 1e-12 bracket; the 1e-6 harness scored them solved. Same defect in our bisection, false-position family, Ridders, Brent, ITP and twelve copies in stage scripts, simroot/sim.py and one test; all replaced by _opposite / _same_sign, pinned by test_sign_underflow.

2026-09-21 12:49:01 +01:00