vvsandClaude Opus 5 3d9287ec2c PREREG_defect_contra_flat outcome (smoke, all 199 problems). Goal (below Chandrupatla on both) NOT reached by any cell: best CHA 2537 vs 2441. Best total: defect+flatanalogmem APS 2530 / CHA 2561 = 5091 < Chandrupatla 5228 (first time), C1-C3 hold; ablation: defect earns APS +284 (costs CHA 9), remembered analogy earns CHA +649 (costs APS 7). contra earned without defect (APS 2806 -> 2785, CHA 3220 -> 3198; with the remembered analogy 2792 / 2537, the best CHA), redundant with defect (defect+contra = defect). fun9: 105 -> 81 (Chandrupatla 55). Remaining CHA gap 120: flat +88, fun1 +20, fun9 +26. Server regression x2: 1116 passed, 1 failed = the paper-number check. ...

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-09-21 15:57:15 +01:00

..

__init__.py

baseline: the published sim-numerics artifact as it stands (490 tests, verify_article.py checks all 72 paper numbers against sweep_full.json)

2026-09-20 22:38:17 +01:00

baselines.py

Sign tests by product underflowed: FIXED everywhere (branch, not master - the paper is not yet updated). FA * fnew < 0.0 with FA ~ -1e-200, fnew ~ 1e-150 is -0.0 and '-0.0 < 0.0' is False, so on flat functions (x^19) the bracket update moved the wrong end, the root left the bracket and the run still reported convergence - the proposed rule returned 4.9e-9, bisection 3.5e-9, ITP 1.6e-8 with a claimed 1e-12 bracket; the 1e-6 harness scored them solved. Same defect in our bisection, false-position family, Ridders, Brent, ITP and twelve copies in stage scripts, simroot/sim.py and one test; all replaced by _opposite / _same_sign, pinned by test_sign_underflow.

2026-09-21 12:49:01 +01:00

pure.py

PREREG_defect_contra_flat outcome (smoke, all 199 problems). Goal (below Chandrupatla on both) NOT reached by any cell: best CHA 2537 vs 2441. Best total: defect+flatanalogmem APS 2530 / CHA 2561 = 5091 < Chandrupatla 5228 (first time), C1-C3 hold; ablation: defect earns APS +284 (costs CHA 9), remembered analogy earns CHA +649 (costs APS 7). contra earned without defect (APS 2806 -> 2785, CHA 3220 -> 3198; with the remembered analogy 2792 / 2537, the best CHA), redundant with defect (defect+contra = defect). fun9: 105 -> 81 (Chandrupatla 55). Remaining CHA gap 120: flat +88, fun1 +20, fun9 +26. Server regression x2: 1116 passed, 1 failed = the paper-number check.

2026-09-21 15:57:15 +01:00

sim.py

Sign tests by product underflowed: FIXED everywhere (branch, not master - the paper is not yet updated). FA * fnew < 0.0 with FA ~ -1e-200, fnew ~ 1e-150 is -0.0 and '-0.0 < 0.0' is False, so on flat functions (x^19) the bracket update moved the wrong end, the root left the bracket and the run still reported convergence - the proposed rule returned 4.9e-9, bisection 3.5e-9, ITP 1.6e-8 with a claimed 1e-12 bracket; the 1e-6 harness scored them solved. Same defect in our bisection, false-position family, Ridders, Brent, ITP and twelve copies in stage scripts, simroot/sim.py and one test; all replaced by _opposite / _same_sign, pinned by test_sign_underflow.

2026-09-21 12:49:01 +01:00