Impact, every sweep regenerated: the paper's key configurations are unchanged to the evaluation (proposed 2806/3220, credit 3568/3020, Chandrupatla, TOMS 748, Brent, bisection); 46 stated numbers move (ITP CHA 2857 -> 2896, ITP oracle 2611 -> 2647, record CHA figures by 14-18, the grid means by ~1%) and one finding weakens: the measured-order exponent of section 7.1 was cheaper in 29 of 60 far cells and 7 of 7 safeguards; with the fix 12 of 61 and 6 of 7, and on the wide-bracket set it now loses in every safeguard and drops 5 problems. PREREG G1-G3 outcome on the fixed code: G2 (repeating step pattern, period from the data) PASSES Y1-Y4 and is ACCEPTED by the stop rule - proposed rule APS 2806 -> 2782 (below Chandrupatla's 2787), CHA 3220 -> 3169, both 6026 -> 5951, per problem vs Chandrupatla on APS 95/20/38 p = 8e-7. G1 fails Y1/Y2 (its Y3 miss was the sign bug), G3 fails Y2, A fails Y2. Regression 887 pass; the two red tests are the paper-number check (awaiting the paper update) and test_blend (fixed since, copy in stage16). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
23 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
23 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
A and no-lengthening cells identical to sweep_extrap.json: 182 same, 0 differ
|
|
|
|
PROPOSED RULE (tent, 3-point, projection), by mode:
|
|
mode APS CHA both flat Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 vs Chandrupatla APS (w/t/l, p)
|
|
no lengthening 2806 3220 6026 1823 - - ✓ - 87/24/42 p=9.2e-05
|
|
A 2967 2926 5893 1525 ✓ ✗ ✓ ✓ 42/62/49 p=0.53
|
|
G1 confirmed 2933 3281 6214 1859 ✗ ✗ ✓ ✗ 81/28/44 p=0.0012
|
|
G2 pattern 2782 3169 5951 1780 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 95/20/38 p=8.2e-07 ACCEPTED
|
|
G3 steps+results 2953 3205 6158 1804 ✓ ✗ ✓ ✓ 79/28/46 p=0.004
|
|
|
|
Y6 best cell over both sets, per mode (guarantee family, >= 193 solved):
|
|
no lengthening pure+dissim+slope.ratio.derived3.project 2726+2799=5525
|
|
A pure+dissim+ext+slope.ratio.derived3.project 2859+2553=5412
|
|
G1 confirmed pure+dissim+extC+slope.ratio.derived3.project 2882+2757=5639
|
|
G2 pattern pure+dissim+extP+slope.ratio.derived3.project 2759+2789=5548
|
|
G3 steps+results pure+dissim+extR+slope.ratio.derived3.project 2808+2785=5593
|
|
|
|
readings under the projection, APS/CHA by mode:
|
|
slope no 2848/3114 A 2971/2763 G1 3004/2993 G2 2809/3033 G3 2934/3043
|
|
shape+slope no 2675/3498 A 2930/3506 G1 2800/3511 G2 2894/3483 G3 2944/3477
|
|
dissim+slope no 2726/2799 A 2859/2553 G1 2882/2757 G2 2759/2789 G3 2808/2785
|
|
defect no 2523/3210 A 3180/2955 G1 2667/3260 G2 2580/3183 G3 2684/3210
|