Files
sim-numerics/verify_article.py
T
vvsandClaude Opus 5 862feaff86 Revision 1, step 1: one scoring criterion, the correct order, and the internal inconsistencies.
Point 1. The base step's order is Muller's 1.839, not 2: the derivative of the parabola through
the last three points errs by f'''/6 (x_n - x_{n-1})(x_n - x_{n-2}) = O(e_{n-1} e_{n-2}).
order_high_precision.py (3000 digits, to 1e-2900): 1.840 on cos x - x, e^x - 2, x^3 - x - 2,
sin x - 1/2; 2.000 only on x^2 - 2; two-point 1.618. The double-precision medians (2.000, 1.94)
are removed from the text.

Point 3. Every protocol number is re-scored under the criterion of section 9 - a sign change
within 1e-6 or f(x) == 0. rescore_uniform.py re-runs all 2779 distinct configurations of the 25
protocol sweeps on APS and CHA (the runs did not keep x) -> sweep_uniform.json, same row format;
it reproduces the APS/CHA lines of Table 10 exactly (built-in check). verify_article.py,
audit_similarity_places.py and the gap diagnostics read the re-scored data; the multiplier and
endowment measurements score by the same criterion. Table 7 (two criteria side by side) is gone;
7.3 now explains why the criterion is a sign change. Consequences stated in the text: the base
rule 2634 / 2357 against Chandrupatla 2595 / 1505 (1.5% behind on APS, no longer "level"); A'
2259 / 1074 (12.9% and 28.6% below Chandrupatla); the defect reading 2351 is second to the
shape reading 2337, not the record; the remembered analogy is level with no regime (2633 vs
2634) under this criterion; Table 9a's range is 19% to 425%.

Point 8. report_sweep.head_to_head counts every problem, failures charged (it counted only the
problems both methods solved, which is why Table 8 rows summed to 153 and 40). Family-level
comparisons added (A' vs Chandrupatla 8/1/6 of 15 and 7/0/2 of 9 families, not significant), and
an independence paragraph in section 9.

Point 11. sweep_itp.py: ITP (recommended constants and per-problem oracle) on all six corpora ->
Table 10; behind A' on every corpus, 0 bound violations.

Points 7, 9, 10 and the internals: the 2x bound is ours, not the rivals' promise; the law
predicts the group order only; "outside the proven bracket" explained (narrowest bracket of all
observed signs); 7.4's fun1 paragraph corrected (five costs under safe; the unguarded numbers
belong to fun1.4, fun1.5 and to fun3.1, fun5.1 separately); Table 1's last cell; the corpus-4
composition and odd multiplicities stated, also in the abstract.

build_tex.py: pdflatex output decoded with errors="replace" (a UTF-8 character cut by TeX's log
wrap crashed the build). Table 10 column widths rebalanced.

Checks: verify_article on the server 500 OK / 0 BAD (467 existing with the new values, 33 new);
regression x2 on the server 1232 passed, 0 failed; PDF 28 pages, 0 errors, 0 undefined, 0 overfull.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-22 07:01:36 +01:00

1008 lines
52 KiB
Python

"""Check every number the paper states against sweep_full.json.
A paper is a claim about data; transcribing its tables by hand is how a claim
stops matching its data. A failure here means the paper is wrong, not the
test.
PROPOSED/PROJ below is the BASE rule of section 3: the scheduled projection with its
multiplier DECLARED as the one free constant (Valeri, 2026-09-21, variant a); the method
the paper now proposes, A', is checked in verify_flat_regime_and_oos(); the earned projection
(credit) is the constant-free variant. Both are checked. Baselines are the
library alone since 2026-09-21: Chandrupatla = scipy elementwise.find_root,
Brent = brentq.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import os
import sys
from report_sweep import CREDIT, PROPOSED, head_to_head, place, rank
FAILS = []
PROJ = "pure.ratio.derived3.project"
assert PROPOSED == PROJ, "the paper proposes the projection (variant a)"
def check(label, got, want):
ok = got == want
print(f" {'OK ' if ok else 'BAD'} {label:58s} got {got!r:>16} "
f"want {want!r}")
if not ok:
FAILS.append(label)
def row(rows, setname, lbl):
return next(r for r in rows if r["label"] == lbl)[setname]
def main():
rows = _load("sweep_full.json")
# Guard against quoting places from a field that is missing a competitor.
# It has already happened once: before Chandrupatla's own method was
# added, every ranking assertion here passed only because the method that
# beats us was absent.
labels = {r["label"] for r in rows}
missing = {"chandrupatla", "dekker", PROPOSED} - labels
if missing:
print(f" !! THE SWEEP IS STALE: missing {sorted(missing)}. "
"Re-run sweep_full.py.\n")
FAILS.append("sweep is stale")
check("number of configurations", len(rows), 264)
# ---- the proposed method: projection, one declared constant ----------
print("\nThe proposed method (projection, multiplier declared):")
for setname, pl, tot, sol in (("APS", 3, 2634, 154),
("CHA", 49, 2357, 45)):
d = row(rows, setname, PROPOSED)
check(f"{setname} place", place(rows, setname, PROPOSED), pl)
check(f"{setname} total", d["total"], tot)
check(f"{setname} solved", d["solved"], sol)
check("both sets", row(rows, "APS", PROPOSED)["total"]
+ row(rows, "CHA", PROPOSED)["total"], 4991)
print("\nHead to head of the proposed method:")
for setname, opp, want in [
("APS", "chandrupatla", (87, 24, 43)),
("APS", "toms748", (86, 16, 52)),
("APS", "brent", (102, 11, 41)),
("APS", "itp", (132, 3, 19)),
("APS", "itp_oracle", (121, 4, 29)),
("APS", "bisection", (152, 1, 1)),
("CHA", "chandrupatla", (11, 5, 29)),
("CHA", "toms748", (33, 1, 11)),
("CHA", "brent", (34, 4, 7)),
("CHA", "itp", (18, 1, 26)),
("CHA", "itp_oracle", (16, 1, 28))]:
w, t, l, _ = head_to_head(rows, PROPOSED, opp, setname)
check(f"{setname} vs {opp}", (w, t, l), want)
def sign_p(w, l):
import math as _m
k, n = min(w, l), w + l
return min(1.0, 2.0 * sum(_m.comb(n, i) for i in range(k + 1)) / 2.0 ** n)
w, _t, l, _ = head_to_head(rows, PROPOSED, "chandrupatla", "APS")
check("APS vs Chandrupatla sign test p (2 digits)", float(f"{sign_p(w, l):.2g}"), 0.00014)
w, _t, l, _ = head_to_head(rows, PROPOSED, "chandrupatla", "CHA")
check("CHA vs Chandrupatla sign test p (rounded)", round(sign_p(w, l), 3), 0.006)
# ---- the constant-free variant ---------------------------------------
print("\nThe constant-free variant (earned projection):")
for setname, pl, tot in (("APS", 25, 3377), ("CHA", 9, 2073)):
check(f"credit {setname} place", place(rows, setname, CREDIT), pl)
check(f"credit {setname} total", row(rows, setname, CREDIT)["total"], tot)
check("credit both sets", row(rows, "APS", CREDIT)["total"]
+ row(rows, "CHA", CREDIT)["total"], 5450)
check("credit costs 743 more on the canonical set",
row(rows, "APS", CREDIT)["total"] - row(rows, "APS", PROPOSED)["total"], 743)
for setname, opp, want in [("APS", "chandrupatla", (79, 3, 72)),
("APS", "toms748", (78, 9, 67)),
("APS", "brent", (79, 5, 70))]:
w, t, l, _ = head_to_head(rows, CREDIT, opp, setname)
check(f"credit {setname} vs {opp}", (w, t, l), want)
w, _t, l, _ = head_to_head(rows, CREDIT, "chandrupatla", "APS")
check("credit APS vs Chandrupatla sign test p (rounded)", round(sign_p(w, l), 2), 0.63)
# ---- what the earlier, order-destroying guards cost --------------------
print("\nThe guards that replace the step instead of projecting it:")
check("APS unguarded", row(rows, "APS", "pure.ratio.derived3.none")["total"],
2634)
cha_none = row(rows, "CHA", "pure.ratio.derived3.none")
check("CHA unguarded total", cha_none["total"], 3391)
check("CHA unguarded solved", cha_none["solved"], 39)
check("CHA unguarded bound violations", cha_none["over"], 10)
check("APS bracket-guard", row(rows, "APS", "pure.ratio.derived3.bracket")["total"],
7068)
check("APS both-guard", row(rows, "APS", "pure.ratio.derived3.both")["total"],
7046)
# ---- the field --------------------------------------------------------
print("\nAlefeld-Potra-Shi:")
check("APS winner", rank(rows, "APS")[0]["label"], "chandrupatla")
for lbl, pl, tot in [("chandrupatla", 1, 2595), ("toms748", 4, 2636),
("brent", 5, 2707), ("dekker", 232, 3158),
("itp_oracle", 11, 3068), ("ridders", 15, 3124),
("itp", 29, 3767), ("illinois", 237, 7045),
("bisection", 73, 7338), ("regula_falsi", 244, 10560)]:
check(f"APS {lbl} place", place(rows, "APS", lbl), pl)
check(f"APS {lbl} total", row(rows, "APS", lbl)["total"], tot)
check("APS regula falsi solved", row(rows, "APS", "regula_falsi")["solved"],
127)
print("\nChandrupatla:")
top = rank(rows, "CHA")[0]
check("CHA rank 1 label", top["label"], "chandrupatla")
check("CHA rank 1 solves all 45", top["CHA"]["solved"], 45)
for lbl, pl, tot in [("chandrupatla", 1, 1505), ("itp_oracle", 2, 1675),
("itp", 5, 1946), ("bisection", 15, 2136),
("toms748", 158, 3088), ("brent", 227, 3238)]:
check(f"CHA {lbl} place", place(rows, "CHA", lbl), pl)
check(f"CHA {lbl} total", row(rows, "CHA", lbl)["total"], tot)
check("CHA brent solved", row(rows, "CHA", "brent")["solved"], 43)
ours_both = (row(rows, "APS", PROPOSED)["total"]
+ row(rows, "CHA", PROPOSED)["total"])
cha_both = (row(rows, "APS", "chandrupatla")["total"]
+ row(rows, "CHA", "chandrupatla")["total"])
check("chandrupatla, both sets", cha_both, 4100)
check("Chandrupatla beats us on both sets", cha_both < ours_both, True)
# ---- the regime findings ---------------------------------------------
print("\nNegative results, the regime claims:")
check("CHA cbrt over the whole set",
row(rows, "CHA", "pure.cbrt.derived3.project")["total"], 3204)
switched = (row(rows, "APS", PROJ)["total"]
+ row(rows, "CHA", "pure.cbrt.derived3.project")["total"])
single = row(rows, "APS", PROJ)["total"] + row(rows, "CHA", PROJ)["total"]
check("single fixed choice, both sets", single, 4991)
check("switch by benchmark set, both sets", switched, 5838)
check("switching is worse than not switching", switched > single, True)
for pid, ours_n, cb_n in (("fun4.1", 89, 32), ("fun4.2", 93, 32),
("fun4.3", 113, 40), ("fun4.4", 125, 47),
("fun4.5", 153, 59)):
o = row(rows, "CHA", PROJ)["per"][pid]
c = row(rows, "CHA", "pure.cbrt.derived3.project")["per"][pid]
check(f"{pid} projection variant", o[0], ours_n)
check(f"{pid} cbrt", c[0], cb_n)
# ---- the law across the grid ------------------------------------------
print("\nThe law across the grid:")
lin = ("ratio", "rational", "exp_abs")
quad = ("rat_sq", "exp_sq", "cosine")
want = {("derived3", "lin"): 5764, ("derived3", "quad"): 21200,
("derived", "lin"): 5854, ("derived", "quad"): 21089,
("bracket", "lin"): 9149, ("bracket", "quad"): 18015,
("start", "lin"): 14983, ("start", "quad"): 14228}
for scale in ("derived3", "derived", "bracket", "start"):
for group, gname in ((lin, "lin"), (quad, "quad")):
tot = cnt = 0
for r in rows:
if r["spec"][0] != "pure":
continue
_, sim, sc, gu = r["spec"]
if sc != scale or gu != "step" or sim not in group:
continue
cnt += 1
tot += r["APS"]["total"] + r["CHA"]["total"]
check(f"mean total, scale={scale}, {gname}",
round(tot / cnt), want[(scale, gname)])
best_by_sim, best_by_scale = {}, {}
for r in rows:
if r["spec"][0] != "pure" or r["spec"][3] != "step":
continue
t = r["APS"]["total"] + r["CHA"]["total"]
best_by_sim[r["spec"][1]] = min(best_by_sim.get(r["spec"][1], 10 ** 9), t)
best_by_scale[r["spec"][2]] = min(best_by_scale.get(r["spec"][2], 10 ** 9), t)
check("every c=1 similarity beats every c=0 similarity",
max(best_by_sim[s] for s in lin) < min(best_by_sim[s] for s in quad),
True)
check("similarity ranking",
[s for s, _ in sorted(best_by_sim.items(), key=lambda kv: kv[1])],
["ratio", "exp_abs", "rational", "ratio_soft", "sqrt", "cbrt",
"exp_sq", "rat_sq", "cosine"])
for sim, v in [("ratio", 5422), ("exp_abs", 5772), ("rational", 5993),
("ratio_soft", 8455), ("sqrt", 9411), ("cbrt", 10874),
("exp_sq", 13187), ("rat_sq", 13990), ("cosine", 15272)]:
check(f"similarity {sim} best", best_by_sim[sim], v)
check("scale ranking",
[s for s, _ in sorted(best_by_scale.items(), key=lambda kv: kv[1])],
["derived3", "derived", "bracket", "start"])
for sc, v in [("derived3", 5422), ("derived", 5564), ("bracket", 7972),
("start", 13423)]:
check(f"scale {sc} best", best_by_scale[sc], v)
verify_placement_modes()
verify_per_place()
verify_decision_place()
verify_gap_decomposition()
verify_safeguard_and_tables()
verify_flat_regime_and_oos()
verify_revision1()
print()
if FAILS:
print(f"{len(FAILS)} STATED NUMBERS DO NOT MATCH THE DATA:")
for f in FAILS:
print(f" {f}")
sys.exit(1)
print("every number stated in the paper matches the sweep data.")
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Section "where the similarity is read" (PREREGs of 2026-09-20/21). Each new
# grid lives in its OWN sweep file so the published sweep_full.json stays the
# artefact of the original claims; every number the new section quotes is
# re-checked here against that file.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLACEMENT = {
# file label APS CHA
"sweep_slope.json": ("slope.ratio.derived3.project", 2663, 2170),
"sweep_points.json": ("pure+shape+slope.ratio.derived3.safe", 2337, 2177),
"sweep_direction.json": ("pure+dissim+slope.ratio.derived3.project", 2539, 1864),
"sweep_combo.json": ("pure+shape+dissim+slope.ratio.derived3.safe", 2695, 1928),
"sweep_gate.json": ("progress.ratio.derived.project", 4258, 2093),
"sweep_log.json": ("log.ratio_soft.derived.safe", 6749, 2598),
}
# The per-place table of section "the similarity function belongs to the place":
# seven PAIRED comparisons in sweep_order.json. Checked as pairs, because a pair is
# what the pre-registration licensed and a single cell would prove nothing.
ORDER_PAIRS = {
# guard (APS m=1, APS measured, CHA m=1, CHA measured)
"both": (4331, 3485, 2469, 2306),
"bracket": (4418, 3352, 2671, 2428),
"credit": (4999, 4495, 2064, 1933),
"project": (6783, 6176, 4057, 3751),
"safe": (5803, 5040, 3218, 3032),
"step": (6251, 5362, 3371, 3146),
"none": (10676, 9855, 8265, 7424),
}
# the negative item: the order does not cure false position
ORDER_FALSEPOS = {("rational", "far", "none", "none"): (127, 10676),
("rational", "far", "none", "order"): (129, 9855)}
# and the harmful direction, quoted in the same subsection
ORDER_SLOPE_HARM = {("ratio", "derived3", "none", "none"): 2634,
("ratio", "derived3", "none", "order"): 2703}
def verify_per_place():
print("\nThe per-place reading (sweep_order.json):")
if not os.path.exists("sweep_order.json"):
print(" !! sweep_order.json absent — section 'belongs to the place' unverifiable")
FAILS.append("missing sweep_order.json")
return
rows = _load("sweep_order.json")
def cell(sim, sc, gu, ex):
for r in rows:
s = r["spec"]
if (s[1], s[2], s[3], s[8] if len(s) > 8 else "none") == (sim, sc, gu, ex):
return r
return None
cheaper = 0
for gu, (a1, a2, c1, c2) in ORDER_PAIRS.items():
p = cell("rational", "far", gu, "none")
q = cell("rational", "far", gu, "order")
if p is None or q is None:
FAILS.append(f"order pair {gu} missing from sweep_order.json")
print(f" !! pair {gu} missing — stale sweep")
continue
check(f"far+rational {gu} APS m=1", p["APS"]["total"], a1)
check(f"far+rational {gu} APS order", q["APS"]["total"], a2)
check(f"far+rational {gu} CHA m=1", p["CHA"]["total"], c1)
check(f"far+rational {gu} CHA order", q["CHA"]["total"], c2)
cheaper += (q["APS"]["total"] + q["CHA"]["total"]
< p["APS"]["total"] + p["CHA"]["total"])
check("cheaper in 7 of 7 safeguards", cheaper, 7)
for (sim, sc, gu, ex), (solved, total) in ORDER_FALSEPOS.items():
r = cell(sim, sc, gu, ex)
if r is None:
FAILS.append(f"false-position cell {ex} missing")
continue
check(f"false position {ex} solved", r["APS"]["solved"], solved)
check(f"false position {ex} APS", r["APS"]["total"], total)
for (sim, sc, gu, ex), want in ORDER_SLOPE_HARM.items():
r = cell(sim, sc, gu, ex)
if r is None:
FAILS.append(f"slope-harm cell {ex} missing")
continue
check(f"slope reading {ex} APS", r["APS"]["total"], want)
fam = [r for r in rows if r["spec"][3] in ("project", "safe", "credit")]
check("guarantee family violations", sum(r["APS"]["over"] + r["CHA"]["over"]
for r in fam), 0)
DECISION_CELLS = {
# (similarity, prestep, guard): {set: total}
("ratio", "band", "project"): {"APS": 5242, "CHA": 2101},
("ratio", "band", "credit"): {"CHA": 1942},
("ratio", "none", "project"): {"APS": 2634},
("ratio", "defect", "project"): {"APS": 2351, "CHA": 2346},
("ratio_soft", "simpair", "project"): {"CHA": 1941},
}
DECISION_RATES = {"band": 63.5, "defect": 6.6}
def verify_decision_place():
print("\nThe decision place (sweep_decision.json):")
if not os.path.exists("sweep_decision.json"):
print(" !! sweep_decision.json absent — section 'decision place' unverifiable")
FAILS.append("missing sweep_decision.json")
return
rows = _load("sweep_decision.json")
by = {(r["spec"][1], r["spec"][5], r["spec"][3]): r for r in rows}
for k, sets in DECISION_CELLS.items():
r = by.get(k)
if r is None:
FAILS.append(f"decision cell {k} missing")
print(f" !! {k} missing — stale sweep")
continue
for setname, want in sets.items():
check(f"{'.'.join(k)} {setname}", r[setname]["total"], want)
d = by[("ratio", "defect", "project")]
check("defect APS solved", d["APS"]["solved"], 154)
check("defect both sets", d["APS"]["total"] + d["CHA"]["total"], 4697)
check("defect second to the shape reading (2337 < defect)", 2337 < d["APS"]["total"], True)
fam = [r for r in rows if r["spec"][3] in ("project", "safe", "credit")]
check("decision grid guarantee violations", sum(r["APS"]["over"] + r["CHA"]["over"]
for r in fam), 0)
# the refusal rates are recomputed, not transcribed
from scipy.optimize._tstutils import _APS_TESTS_DICTS, _CHANDRUPATLA_TESTS_DICTS
from simroot.pure import pure_root
probs = [(float(q["bracket"][0]), float(q["bracket"][1]),
(lambda ff, aa: lambda t: ff(t, *aa))(q["f"], q.get("args", ())))
for q in _APS_TESTS_DICTS]
probs += [(float(q["bracket"][0]), float(q["bracket"][1]),
(lambda ff: lambda t: ff(t))(q["f"])) for q in _CHANDRUPATLA_TESTS_DICTS]
for mode, want in DECISION_RATES.items():
ref = nfev = 0
for a, b, f in probs:
st = {}
try:
_x, n, _c = pure_root(f, a, b, 1e-12, 200, similarity="ratio",
scale="derived3", guard="project", prestep=mode,
stats=st)
except Exception:
continue
ref += st.get("pre_refused", 0)
nfev += int(n)
check(f"{mode} refusal rate %", round(100.0 * ref / nfev, 1), want)
def verify_gap_decomposition():
"""Section 7.4 of the .md (sec:widelimit in the .tex): the wide-bracket gap taken
apart on the same evaluations. Every number is RECOMPUTED by running the diagnosis
scripts, not transcribed from their saved printouts."""
import contextlib
import io
print("\nThe gap decomposition (fresh runs of the diagnosis scripts):")
import diag_flat_detectable
import diag_model_order
import diag_model_order_checks
with contextlib.redirect_stdout(io.StringIO()):
mo = diag_model_order.main()
ck = diag_model_order_checks.main()
fl = diag_flat_detectable.main()
per = mo["per_problem"]
check("problems where we lose", len(mo["lose"]), 35)
check("fun1.4 our bracket halvings/eval", round(per["fun1.4"][2], 2), 0.62)
check("fun1.4 IQI from our points", round(per["fun1.4"][3], 2), 10.37)
flat = [p for p in per if p.split(".")[0] in ("fun3", "fun4", "fun5", "fun6")]
check("flat: ours min", round(min(per[p][2] for p in flat), 2), 0.41)
check("flat: ours max", round(max(per[p][2] for p in flat), 2), 0.75)
check("flat: IQI min", round(min(per[p][3] for p in flat), 2), 0.01)
check("flat: IQI max", round(max(per[p][3] for p in flat), 2), 0.17)
check("non-degenerate states with one negative weight", int(mo["neg_ok"]), 431)
check("bracketing states in total", mo["neg_all"], 434)
check("every exception is an underflowed zero weight",
all(any(w == 0.0 for w in ws) for _p, _f, ws in ck["exceptions"]), True)
fam = ck["fam"]
gap = {k: v[2] - v[3] for k, v in fam.items()}
check("total gap on the losing problems", sum(gap.values()), 262)
check("flat families' gap", sum(gap[k] for k in ("fun3", "fun4", "fun5", "fun6")), 172)
check("fun1 gap", gap["fun1"], 58)
for k, want in (("fun3", 92), ("fun4", 96), ("fun5", 100), ("fun6", 100)):
b, q = fam[k][0], fam[k][1]
check(f"Chandrupatla bisect share {k} %", round(100.0 * b / (b + q)), want)
for k, want in (("fun4", 297), ("fun5", 233), ("fun6", 233)):
check(f"Chandrupatla total {k}", fam[k][3], want)
check("m>=2 on canonical states %", float(round(fl["APS (canonical)"][2], 1)), 0.3)
check("m>=2 on flat states %", round(fl["CHA flat fun3-6"][2], 1), 0.0)
# the band per family, from the Linux sweep
rows = _load("sweep_decision.json")
by = {(r["spec"][1], r["spec"][5], r["spec"][3]): r for r in rows}
base = by[("ratio", "none", "project")]["CHA"]["per"]
band = by[("ratio", "band", "project")]["CHA"]["per"]
def fam_total(per_, k):
return sum(n if ok else 200 for pid, (n, ok) in per_.items()
if pid.split(".")[0] == k)
for k, b0, b1 in (("fun4", 573, 296), ("fun5", 456, 239), ("fun6", 456, 228)):
check(f"band {k} no-gate", fam_total(base, k), b0)
check(f"band {k} with band", fam_total(band, k), b1)
for k, d in (("fun1", 164), ("fun2", 111), ("fun8", 170), ("fun9", 144)):
check(f"band cost on {k}", fam_total(band, k) - fam_total(base, k), d)
# negative item 11, corrected pairing: the same configuration in x and in log space
full = _load("sweep_full.json")
xcell = next(r for r in full if r["label"] == "pure.ratio_soft.derived.safe")
check("log item: x-space control APS", xcell["APS"]["total"], 5635)
check("log item: x-space control CHA", xcell["CHA"]["total"], 2759)
def verify_safeguard_and_tables():
"""§3.1 of the .md (the multiplier is a free constant; the earned budget), Tables 2-3
regenerated with Chandrupatla, §5.1, and the constant-free numbers of §7. The
measured tables are RECOMPUTED by running the measurement scripts."""
import contextlib
import io
import measure_budget_factor
import measure_records_vs_multiplier
print("\n§3.1: the multiplier and the endowment (fresh runs):")
with contextlib.redirect_stdout(io.StringIO()):
bf = measure_budget_factor.main()
rm = measure_records_vs_multiplier.main()
for c, (aps, cha) in ((1.0, (4625, 2039)), (1.25, (2626, 1822)), (1.5, (2636, 1991)),
(2.0, (2634, 2357)), (3.0, (2634, 2936)), (4.0, (2634, 3229))):
check(f"multiplier {c} APS", bf[c][0], aps)
check(f"multiplier {c} CHA", bf[c][2], cha)
for c0, (aps, cha) in ((0.1, (5150, 2097)), (0.5, (4462, 2037)), (1.0, (3377, 2073)),
(2.0, (3502, 1757)), (5.0, (2819, 1666))):
check(f"endowment {c0} APS", bf["endowment"][c0][0], aps)
check(f"endowment {c0} CHA", bf["endowment"][c0][1], cha)
within_one_step = {c0: sum(v) for c0, v in bf["endowment"].items() if c0 <= 1.0}
check("C0=1 cheapest within the one-step promise",
min(within_one_step, key=within_one_step.get), 1.0)
sh = rm["shape reading (2527)"]
check("shape reading at multiplier 1.25", sh[1.25][0], 2351)
check("shape reading flat from 1.5 to 4", {sh[f][0] for f in (1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0)}, {2337})
de = rm["defect reading (2523)"]
dv = [de[f][0] for f in (1.25, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0)]
check("defect reading from 1.25 to 4: range", (min(dv), max(dv)), (2343, 2353))
print("\nTables 2-3 regenerated:")
rows = _load("sweep_full.json")
by = {r["label"]: r for r in rows}
none_ = "pure.ratio.derived3.none"
for setname, lbl, pl in (("APS", PROJ, 3), ("APS", none_, 2), ("CHA", PROJ, 49),
("CHA", none_, 229), ("CHA", "pure.exp_abs.bracket.both", 3),
("CHA", "pure.exp_abs.bracket.bracket", 4),
("CHA", "pure.exp_abs.bracket.credit", 6),
("APS", CREDIT, 25), ("CHA", CREDIT, 9)):
check(f"{setname} {lbl} place", place(rows, setname, lbl), pl)
check("CHA exp_abs.bracket.both total", by["pure.exp_abs.bracket.both"]["CHA"]["total"],
1778)
check("CHA TOMS 748 over the 2x bound", by["toms748"]["CHA"]["over"], 15)
check("CHA Brent over the 2x bound", by["brent"]["CHA"]["over"], 18)
for lbl, setname, opp, want in (
(CREDIT, "APS", "itp_oracle", (86, 6, 62)),
(CREDIT, "CHA", "itp_oracle", (2, 2, 41)),
(CREDIT, "CHA", "bisection", (5, 0, 40)),
(PROJ, "APS", "chandrupatla", (87, 24, 43)),
(PROJ, "APS", "itp", (132, 3, 19)),
(PROJ, "APS", "itp_oracle", (121, 4, 29)),
(PROJ, "APS", "bisection", (152, 1, 1)),
(PROJ, "CHA", "toms748", (33, 1, 11)),
(PROJ, "CHA", "brent", (34, 4, 7)),
(PROJ, "CHA", "itp", (18, 1, 26)),
(PROJ, "CHA", "itp_oracle", (16, 1, 28))):
w, t, l, _ = head_to_head(rows, lbl, opp, setname)
check(f"{lbl.split('.')[-1]} {setname} vs {opp}", (w, t, l), want)
for lbl, want in ((CREDIT, 5450), (PROJ, 4991), ("chandrupatla", 4100),
("itp_oracle", 4743), ("toms748", 5724), ("brent", 5945)):
check(f"both sets {lbl}", by[lbl]["APS"]["total"] + by[lbl]["CHA"]["total"], want)
print("\n§7 under the earned projection:")
import glob
cells = {}
for p in glob.glob("sweep_*.json"):
if "smoke" in p:
continue
data = _load(p)
# only grid files (a list of labelled cells); the out-of-sample results
# (sweep_oos.json, sweep_fourth_*.json, ...) are dicts of a different shape
if not isinstance(data, list):
continue
for r in data:
cells.setdefault(r["label"], r)
for lbl, aps, cha in (("slope.ratio.derived3.credit", 3316, 2050),
("pure+shape+slope.ratio.derived3.credit", 3564, 2074),
("pure+dissim+slope.ratio.derived3.credit", 3666, 2052),
("pure+shape+dissim+slope.ratio.derived3.credit", 4163, 2087),
("defect.ratio.derived3.credit", 3354, 2002)):
check(f"{lbl} APS", cells[lbl]["APS"]["total"], aps)
check(f"{lbl} CHA", cells[lbl]["CHA"]["total"], cha)
free = [r for r in cells.values() if r.get("spec") and len(r["spec"]) > 3
and r["spec"][0] == "pure" and r["spec"][3] == "credit"
and r["APS"]["solved"] + r["CHA"]["solved"] == r["APS"]["n"] + r["CHA"]["n"]]
top = min(free, key=lambda r: r["APS"]["total"] + r["CHA"]["total"])
check("best constant-free configuration", top["label"],
"defect+flatanalogmempt+exp+half.ratio.derived3.credit")
check("its total over both sets", top["APS"]["total"] + top["CHA"]["total"], 4965)
d = cells["defect.ratio.derived3.credit"]
check("defect under the earned projection, both sets",
d["APS"]["total"] + d["CHA"]["total"], 5356)
PLACEMENT_PER_SET = {
"sweep_direction.json": ("CHA", "pure+dissim+slope.ratio.derived3.safe", 1752),
"sweep_gate.json": ("CHA", "progress.ratio_soft.derived.safe", 1929),
}
def verify_placement_modes():
print("\nThe placement modes (each in its own sweep file):")
for path, (lbl, aps, cha) in PLACEMENT.items():
if not os.path.exists(path):
print(f" !! {path} absent — the section quoting it cannot be verified")
FAILS.append(f"missing {path}")
continue
rows = _load(path)
try:
d = next(r for r in rows if r["label"] == lbl)
except StopIteration:
print(f" !! {lbl} not in {path} — stale sweep")
FAILS.append(f"{lbl} missing from {path}")
continue
check(f"{lbl} APS", d["APS"]["total"], aps)
check(f"{lbl} CHA", d["CHA"]["total"], cha)
check(f"{lbl} solved", d["APS"]["solved"] + d["CHA"]["solved"], 199)
check(f"{lbl} guarantee (over 2x)", d["APS"]["over"] + d["CHA"]["over"], 0)
for path, (setname, lbl, want) in PLACEMENT_PER_SET.items():
if not os.path.exists(path):
continue
rows = _load(path)
d = next((r for r in rows if r["label"] == lbl), None)
if d is None:
FAILS.append(f"{lbl} missing from {path}")
continue
check(f"{lbl} {setname} per-set", d[setname]["total"], want)
def _load(path):
"""A results file. A row-format protocol sweep (a list of labelled cells) is served from
sweep_uniform.json, its re-scoring under the paper's single criterion - a sign change
within 1e-6 or f(x) == 0 (revision point 3, 2026-09-22); every other file as stored."""
from rescore_uniform import load_uniform
with open(path, encoding="utf8") as fh:
data = json.load(fh)
if isinstance(data, list) and data and "spec" in data[0]:
return load_uniform(path)
return data
def _cell(path, lbl):
return next(r for r in _load(path) if r["label"] == lbl)
def _flat_sum(r):
return sum(n if ok else 200 for pid, (n, ok) in r["CHA"]["per"].items()
if pid.split(".")[0] in ("fun3", "fun4", "fun5", "fun6"))
def verify_flat_regime_and_oos():
"""Sections 8-9 and negative items 12-16 of the .md, and the abstract that quotes them:
the flat regime by analogy, the proposed method A', its ablation, and the out-of-sample
corpora. Every number is read from a server results file or recomputed by the diagnosis
scripts; none is transcribed."""
import contextlib
import io
import math
import re
print("\nSection 8 and negative items 12-16 (the development grids):")
P = "ratio.derived3.project"
for path, lbl, aps, cha in (
("sweep_flat.json", f"flat.{P}", 2839, 2243),
("sweep_flat2.json", f"flat2.{P}", 2613, 2388),
("sweep_flatcreep.json", f"flatcreep.{P}", 2688, 2399),
("sweep_flatstick.json", f"flatstickmid.{P}", 6707, 2063),
("sweep_flatexit.json", f"flatstickexit.{P}", 2935, 1546),
("sweep_flatjudge.json", f"flatjudge.{P}", 2820, 1532),
("sweep_orderpt.json", f"flatanalogmem.{P}", 2633, None),
("sweep_half.json", f"half.{P}", 2392, None)):
r = _cell(path, lbl)
check(f"{lbl} APS", r["APS"]["total"], aps)
if cha is not None:
check(f"{lbl} CHA", r["CHA"]["total"], cha)
check(f"{lbl} guarantee", r["APS"]["over"] + r["CHA"]["over"], 0)
check("sticky with order from the failed promise, APS",
_cell("sweep_flatstick.json", f"flatstick.{P}")["APS"]["total"], 6591)
check("sticky midpoint: flat families",
_flat_sum(_cell("sweep_flatstick.json", f"flatstickmid.{P}")), 1057)
full = {r["label"]: r for r in _load("sweep_full.json")}
check("bisection: flat families", _flat_sum(full["bisection"]), 1044)
check("Chandrupatla: flat families", _flat_sum(full["chandrupatla"]), 1068)
op = {r["label"]: r for r in _load("sweep_orderpt.json")}
check("split from the order: flat families, low end",
_flat_sum(op[f"flatanalogmempt.{P}"]), 743)
check("split from the order: flat families, high end",
_flat_sum(op[f"pure+extP+flatanalogpt.{P}"]), 847)
check("item 16: remembered + split, with the step pattern, CHA",
op[f"pure+extP+flatanalogmempt.{P}"]["CHA"]["total"], 1250)
check("item 16: one-state analogy + split, with the step pattern, CHA",
op[f"pure+extP+flatanalogpt.{P}"]["CHA"]["total"], 1388)
print("\nSection 8 diagnostics (fresh runs):")
import diag_analogy_decoupled
import diag_flat_analogy
import diag_flat_stick
buf = io.StringIO()
with contextlib.redirect_stdout(buf):
diag_flat_analogy.main()
out = buf.getvalue()
aps = re.search(r"^APS\s+154\s+(\d+)\s+(\d+)\s+(\d+)", out, re.M)
flat = re.search(r"^CHA-flat\s+20\s+(\d+)\s+(\d+)\s+(\d+)", out, re.M)
check("flag rises on canonical problems", int(aps.group(1)), 142)
check("flag + analogy + m>=2 on canonical problems", int(aps.group(3)), 3)
check("flag + analogy + m>=2 on flat problems", int(flat.group(3)), 20)
for fam in ("fun2", "fun8", "fun9"):
m = re.search(rf"^CHA-{fam}\s+5\s+\d+\s+\d+\s+(\d+)", out, re.M)
check(f"flag + analogy + m>=2 on {fam}", int(m.group(1)), 0)
buf = io.StringIO()
with contextlib.redirect_stdout(buf):
diag_analogy_decoupled.main()
m = re.search(r"mean entry state ([\d.]+) \(same state\) -> ([\d.]+)", buf.getvalue())
check("mean entry state, one state", m.group(1), "12.9")
check("mean entry state, remembered", m.group(2), "8.2")
buf = io.StringIO()
with contextlib.redirect_stdout(buf):
diag_flat_stick.main()
inf = tot = 0
for d in re.findall(r"order read at entry: (\{[^}]*\})", buf.getvalue()):
dd = eval(d) # noqa: S307 - the diagnosis script's own printed dict
inf += dd.get("inf", 0)
tot += sum(dd.values())
check("order from the failed promise is inf", (inf, tot), (163, 174))
from simroot.pure import pure_root
ap = "contra+flatanalogmempt+exp+half+close+sub"
def n_of(f, a, b, pre="none", ext="none"):
return pure_root(f, a, b, 1e-12, 200, similarity="ratio", scale="derived3",
guard="project", prestep=pre, extrapolate=ext)[1]
sq = lambda t: math.sqrt(abs(t)) * (0.0 if t == 0 else math.copysign(1.0, t)) # noqa: E731
check("sqrt|x| sgn x, base rule", n_of(sq, -1 / 3, 1.0), 84)
check("sin on [3,4], base rule", n_of(math.sin, 3.0, 4.0), 24)
check("sin on [3,4], A'", n_of(math.sin, 3.0, 4.0, ap, "pattern"), 7)
print("\nTable 8 (A' on the protocol of section 4, sweep_aprime.json):")
rows_ap = _load("sweep_aprime.json")
A = f"pure+extP+{ap}.ratio.derived3"
apr = {r["label"]: r for r in rows_ap}
a = apr[f"{A}.project"]
check("A' APS", a["APS"]["total"], 2259)
check("A' CHA", a["CHA"]["total"], 1074)
check("A' both", a["APS"]["total"] + a["CHA"]["total"], 3333)
check("A' solved", a["APS"]["solved"] + a["CHA"]["solved"], 199)
c = apr[f"{A}.credit"]
check("A' earned budget", (c["APS"]["total"], c["CHA"]["total"]), (3417, 1852))
check("A' under every safeguard: violations",
sum(r["APS"]["over"] + r["CHA"]["over"] for lb, r in apr.items() if lb.startswith(A)), 0)
check("A' safeguards measured", sum(1 for lb in apr if lb.startswith(A + ".")), 7)
both = [r for r in _load("sweep_full.json")] + rows_ap
for setname, opp, want in (("APS", "chandrupatla", (103, 20, 31)),
("CHA", "chandrupatla", (31, 4, 10)),
("APS", "toms748", (127, 6, 21)), ("CHA", "toms748", (42, 2, 1)),
("APS", "brent", (118, 17, 19)), ("CHA", "brent", (39, 3, 3)),
("APS", "itp_oracle", (126, 7, 21)),
("CHA", "itp_oracle", (35, 1, 9))):
w, t, l, _ = head_to_head(both, f"{A}.project", opp, setname)
check(f"A' {setname} vs {opp}", (w, t, l), want)
def sign_p(w, l):
k, n = min(w, l), w + l
return min(1.0, 2.0 * sum(math.comb(n, i) for i in range(k + 1)) / 2.0 ** n)
check("A' APS vs Chandrupatla p (1 digit)", float(f"{sign_p(103, 31):.1g}"), 3e-10)
check("A' CHA vs Chandrupatla p (1 digit)", float(f"{sign_p(31, 10):.1g}"), 0.001)
check("A' below Chandrupatla, APS %", round(100 * (1 - 2259 / 2595), 1), 12.9)
check("A' below Chandrupatla, CHA %", round(100 * (1 - 1074 / 1505), 1), 28.6)
from where_we_lose import per_family
af, cf = per_family(a, "CHA"), per_family(full["chandrupatla"], "CHA")
check("A' fun9 vs Chandrupatla", (af["fun9"], cf["fun9"]), (65, 55))
check("A' ahead on wide-bracket families", sum(af[k] < cf[k] for k in cf), 7)
check("A' fun7 vs Chandrupatla", (af["fun7"], cf["fun7"]), (69, 64))
print("\nTable 9 (ablation of A' on six corpora, sweep_ablation_all.json):")
ab = _load("sweep_ablation_all.json")
sets = ("APS", "CHA", "NEW", "RJL", "APP", "D")
def tot(r, s):
return sum(n if ok else 200 for n, ok, _o in r[s].values())
base_ = {s: tot(ab["ablA'"], s) for s in sets}
for comp, want in (("-regime", (-7, 1013, 1660, 324, 77, 2269)),
("-point", (-5, 479, 667, 272, 30, 1672)),
("-sub", (-6, 0, -7, 16, 63, 893)),
("-close", (130, 35, 97, 78, 135, -2)),
("-half", (249, 65, 82, -16, -5, 1)),
("-exp", (31, 143, 100, -21, -2, 87)),
("-G2", (-22, -6, 123, -30, -10, 34)),
("-contra", (11, -12, 29, 0, 1, -1))):
got = tuple(tot(ab[f"abl{comp}"], s) - base_[s] for s in sets)
check(f"ablation {comp}", got, want)
print("\nSection 9 (out-of-sample corpora):")
seen, four = _load("sweep_fourth_seen.json"), _load("sweep_fourth_fourth.json")
for k in seen:
seen[k].update(four[k])
names = {"APS": 154, "CHA": 45, "NEW": 206, "RJL": 78, "APP": 132, "D": 240}
for s, n in names.items():
check(f"corpus {s} size", len(seen["Aprime"][s]), n)
table10 = {"APS": (2259, 2595, 2707, 2636, (103, 20, 31)),
"CHA": (1074, 1505, 3238, 3088, (31, 4, 10)),
"NEW": (3290, 3716, 6395, 5746, (108, 33, 65)),
"RJL": (1371, 1566, 2455, 2339, (44, 14, 20)),
"APP": (1382, 1382, 1503, 1756, (48, 52, 32)),
"D": (3656, 5717, 8267, 8084, (177, 35, 28))}
def cost(v):
return v[0] if v[1] else 200
for s, (ta, tc, tb, tt, wtl) in table10.items():
got = tuple(tot(seen[k], s) for k in ("Aprime", "chandrupatla", "brent", "toms748"))
check(f"Table 10 {s} totals", got, (ta, tc, tb, tt))
ps = list(seen["Aprime"][s])
w = sum(cost(seen["Aprime"][s][p]) < cost(seen["chandrupatla"][s][p]) for p in ps)
l = sum(cost(seen["Aprime"][s][p]) > cost(seen["chandrupatla"][s][p]) for p in ps)
check(f"Table 10 {s} vs Chandrupatla", (w, len(ps) - w - l, l), wtl)
check(f"Table 10 {s} A' violations", sum(v[2] for v in seen["Aprime"][s].values()), 0)
viol = {k: sum(v[2] for s in names for v in seen[k][s].values()) for k in ("brent", "toms748")}
check("Brent / TOMS 748 bound violations over 855", (viol["brent"], viol["toms748"]), (118, 84))
check("all 855 totals", tuple(sum(tot(seen[k], s) for s in names)
for k in ("Aprime", "chandrupatla", "brent", "toms748")),
(13032, 16481, 24565, 23649))
d4 = seen["Aprime"]["D"]
for label, cls, want in (("without targeted", ("D1", "D2", "D4", "D5"), (2403, 3569, (107, 31, 22))),
("simple roots", ("D1", "D4"), (737, 747, (43, 22, 15)))):
ps = [p for p in d4 if p[:2] in cls]
a_ = sum(cost(d4[p]) for p in ps)
c_ = sum(cost(seen["chandrupatla"]["D"][p]) for p in ps)
w = sum(cost(d4[p]) < cost(seen["chandrupatla"]["D"][p]) for p in ps)
l = sum(cost(d4[p]) > cost(seen["chandrupatla"]["D"][p]) for p in ps)
check(f"corpus 4 {label}", (a_, c_, (w, len(ps) - w - l, l)), want)
for cls, want in (("D1", (433, 419, (20, 8, 12))), ("D2", (1163, 1805, (39, 1, 0))),
("D3", (924, 1784, (37, 1, 2))), ("D4", (304, 328, (23, 14, 3))),
("D5", (503, 1017, (25, 8, 7))), ("D6", (329, 364, (33, 3, 4)))):
ps = [p for p in d4 if p.startswith(cls)]
a_ = sum(cost(d4[p]) for p in ps)
c_ = sum(cost(seen["chandrupatla"]["D"][p]) for p in ps)
w = sum(cost(d4[p]) < cost(seen["chandrupatla"]["D"][p]) for p in ps)
l = sum(cost(d4[p]) > cost(seen["chandrupatla"]["D"][p]) for p in ps)
check(f"Table 11 {cls}", (a_, c_, (w, len(ps) - w - l, l)), want)
c5 = [p for p in seen["Aprime"]["NEW"] if p.startswith("C5")]
check("near-cancelling class of corpus 1", (sum(cost(seen["Aprime"]["NEW"][p]) for p in c5),
sum(cost(seen["chandrupatla"]["NEW"][p]) for p in c5)),
(491, 391))
# the pre-registered verdicts on corpora 1-3 (variant without close and sub)
oos = _load("sweep_oos.json")
def tot_new(r):
return sum(n if ok else 200 for n, ok, _o in r["NEW"].values())
def h2h_new(r, o, keep=lambda p: True):
ps = [p for p in r["NEW"] if keep(p)]
w = sum(cost(r["NEW"][p]) < cost(o["NEW"][p]) for p in ps)
l = sum(cost(r["NEW"][p]) > cost(o["NEW"][p]) for p in ps)
return w, len(ps) - w - l, l
check("corpus 1, variant carried: total vs Chandrupatla",
(tot_new(oos["A"]), tot_new(oos["chandrupatla"])), (3492, 3899))
check("corpus 1, variant carried: per problem", h2h_new(oos["A"], oos["chandrupatla"]),
(105, 34, 67))
check("corpus 1, with defect: per problem", h2h_new(oos["B"], oos["chandrupatla"]),
(95, 33, 78))
check("corpus 1, with defect: exponential class",
h2h_new(oos["B"], oos["chandrupatla"], lambda p: p.startswith("C4")), (9, 5, 26))
rj = _load("sweep_rootsjl.json")
keep = [p for p, v in rj["A"].items() if not v[3]]
check("Roots.jl, variant carried: totals", (sum(cost(rj["A"][p]) for p in keep),
sum(cost(rj["chandrupatla"][p]) for p in keep)),
(1464, 1566))
w = sum(cost(rj["A"][p]) < cost(rj["chandrupatla"][p]) for p in keep)
l = sum(cost(rj["A"][p]) > cost(rj["chandrupatla"][p]) for p in keep)
check("Roots.jl, variant carried: per problem", (w, len(keep) - w - l, l), (38, 10, 30))
app = _load("sweep_applied.json")
check("applied, variant carried: totals", (sum(cost(v) for v in app["A"].values()),
sum(cost(v) for v in app["chandrupatla"].values())),
(1580, 1382))
print("\nModAB (sweep_modab.json, the authors' package):")
mb = _load("sweep_modab.json")
ms = mb["seen"]["modab"]
check("Table 8 ModAB APS, CHA, both",
(sum(cost(v) for v in ms["APS"].values()), sum(cost(v) for v in ms["CHA"].values()),
sum(cost(v) for s_ in ("APS", "CHA") for v in ms[s_].values())), (2726, 1681, 4407))
for setname, want in (("APS", (118, 10, 26)), ("CHA", (34, 4, 7))):
am = {p: v for p, v in a[setname]["per"].items()}
mm = ms[setname]
w = sum(cost(am[p]) < cost(mm[p]) for p in am)
l = sum(cost(am[p]) > cost(mm[p]) for p in am)
check(f"Table 8 A' vs ModAB {setname}", (w, len(am) - w - l, l), want)
md = dict(mb["seen"]["modab"])
md.update(mb["fourth"]["modab"])
worst_p = 0.0
for s, (tm, vm, wtl) in {"APS": (2726, 0, (118, 10, 26)), "CHA": (1681, 0, (34, 4, 7)),
"NEW": (3809, 1, (125, 26, 55)), "RJL": (1446, 0, (47, 11, 20)),
"APP": (1460, 0, (76, 35, 21)), "D": (5535, 8, (183, 23, 34))}.items():
m = md[s]
check(f"Table 10 ModAB {s}", (sum(cost(v) for v in m.values()),
sum(v[2] for v in m.values())), (tm, vm))
ps = list(seen["Aprime"][s])
w = sum(cost(seen["Aprime"][s][p]) < cost(m[p]) for p in ps)
l = sum(cost(seen["Aprime"][s][p]) > cost(m[p]) for p in ps)
check(f"Table 10 A' vs ModAB {s}", (w, len(ps) - w - l, l), wtl)
worst_p = max(worst_p, sign_p(w, l))
check("A' vs ModAB: every corpus p <= 0.0013", round(worst_p, 4) <= 0.0013, True)
check("ModAB over all 855", sum(sum(cost(v) for v in md[s].values()) for s in names), 16657)
check("ModAB violations over 855", sum(v[2] for s in names for v in md[s].values()), 9)
check("corpus 4 A' vs ModAB p (1 digit)", f"{sign_p(183, 34):.1g}", "7e-26")
rjm = mb["rjl"]
ps91 = list(rjm["Aprime"])
w = sum(cost(rjm["Aprime"][p]) < cost(rjm["modab"][p]) for p in ps91)
l = sum(cost(rjm["Aprime"][p]) > cost(rjm["modab"][p]) for p in ps91)
check("ModAB's own benchmark, all 91", (len(ps91), sum(cost(rjm["Aprime"][p]) for p in ps91),
sum(cost(rjm["modab"][p]) for p in ps91),
(w, len(ps91) - w - l, l)),
(91, 1507, 1588, (56, 13, 22)))
check("ModAB's own benchmark p (2 digits)", f"{sign_p(w, l):.2g}", "0.00015")
print("\nTable 9a and section 7: the similarity in the step (fresh audit run):")
aps_ = {r["spec"][1]: r for r in _load("sweep_aprime_s.json")}
abs_ = _load("sweep_ablation_s.json")
t9a = {"ratio": (3333, 13032), "exp_abs": (3965, 14142), "rational": (4424, 14843),
"ratio_soft": (7249, 28500), "sqrt": (11613, 45552), "cbrt": (16094, 63031),
"exp_sq": (17429, 67701), "cosine": (17487, 67854), "rat_sq": (17452, 67394)}
for s_, (two, six) in t9a.items():
r = aps_[s_]
check(f"Table 9a {s_} APS+CHA", r["APS"]["total"] + r["CHA"]["total"], two)
check(f"Table 9a {s_} six corpora", sum(tot(abs_[f"S:{s_}"], s) for s in sets), six)
check(f"Table 9a {s_} guarantee", r["APS"]["over"] + r["CHA"]["over"]
+ sum(v[2] for s in sets for v in abs_[f"S:{s_}"][s].values()), 0)
check("nearest other S costs more, two sets %", round(100 * (3965 / 3333 - 1)), 19)
check("worst S costs more, two sets %", round(100 * (17487 / 3333 - 1)), 425)
check("nearest other S costs more, six corpora %", round(100 * (14142 / 13032 - 1)), 9)
check("quadratic S: five times",
(int(17429 / 3333), int(67854 / 13032)), (5, 5))
import audit_similarity_places
buf = io.StringIO()
with contextlib.redirect_stdout(buf):
audit_similarity_places.main()
rows_a = {ln.split(" ")[0].strip(): re.findall(r"([+-]\d+) \|", ln)
for ln in buf.getvalue().splitlines() if " | " in ln}
check("audit: shape gain with the tent (APS)", int(rows_a["tent 1-|z|"][1]), -493)
check("audit: shape gain with 1/sqrt(1+z^2) (APS)", int(rows_a["1/sqrt(1+z^2)"][1]), 250)
check("audit: defect gain with the tent (APS)", int(rows_a["tent 1-|z|"][3]), -283)
check("audit: defect gain with 1-|z|^1/3 (APS)", int(rows_a["1-|z|^1/3"][3]), 215)
# every sign-test p the paper prints in Section 9, at the precision printed
for (w, l), printed in (((103, 31), "3e-10"), ((31, 10), "0.001"), ((108, 65), "0.001"),
((44, 20), "0.004"), ((48, 32), "0.09"), ((177, 28), "1e-27"),
((107, 22), "1e-14"), ((43, 15), "0.0003"), ((105, 67), "0.005"),
((38, 30), "0.4")):
check(f"sign test p for {w}:{l}", f"{sign_p(w, l):.1g}", printed)
def verify_revision1():
"""Revision 1 (2026-09-22): the claims added or restated by the revision - the order
of the base step, section 7.3's solved counts, the families as the unit, ITP in Table 10,
negative items 5 and 9, and the one canonical problem the multiplier moves. Recomputed."""
import contextlib
import io
import math
import re
from collections import defaultdict
print("\nRevision 1:")
import order_high_precision
buf = io.StringIO()
with contextlib.redirect_stdout(buf):
order_high_precision.main()
out = buf.getvalue()
check("Muller order", re.search(r"Muller order .*: ([\d.]+)", out).group(1), "1.8393")
for name in ("cos x - x", "exp(x) - 2", "x^3 - x - 2", "sin x - 1/2"):
line = next(ln for ln in out.splitlines() if ln.startswith(name))
three = line[14:54].split()
check(f"three-point order settles, {name}", three[-2], "1.840")
line = next(ln for ln in out.splitlines() if ln.startswith("x^2 - 2"))
check("three-point order on x^2 - 2", line[14:54].split()[-1], "2.000")
check("two-point order, cos x - x", next(ln for ln in out.splitlines()
if ln.startswith("cos x - x"))[54:].split()[-1], "1.618")
rows = _load("sweep_full.json")
by = {r["label"]: r for r in rows}
solved = {k: by[k]["APS"]["solved"] + by[k]["CHA"]["solved"]
for k in ("chandrupatla", "toms748", "itp", "bisection", "brent", "dekker",
"illinois")}
check("section 7.3 solved counts", solved, {"chandrupatla": 199, "toms748": 199,
"itp": 199, "bisection": 199, "brent": 197,
"dekker": 178, "illinois": 177})
check("Chandrupatla fewer than the base rule, APS %",
round(100 * (by[PROJ]["APS"]["total"] / by["chandrupatla"]["APS"]["total"] - 1), 1), 1.5)
none_ = by["pure.ratio.derived3.none"]["CHA"]
check("guarantee on CHA: more solved, fewer evaluations",
(45 - none_["solved"], round(100 * (1 - by[PROJ]["CHA"]["total"] / none_["total"]))),
(6, 30))
check("earned costs 28% more on APS",
round(100 * (by[CREDIT]["APS"]["total"] / by[PROJ]["APS"]["total"] - 1)), 28)
def cost(v):
return v[0] if v[1] else 200
def fam_of(pid):
return ".".join(pid.split(".")[:2]) if pid.startswith("aps") else pid.split(".")[0]
def families(a, b, s):
ta, tb = defaultdict(int), defaultdict(int)
for p in a[s]["per"]:
ta[fam_of(p)] += cost(a[s]["per"][p])
tb[fam_of(p)] += cost(b[s]["per"][p])
w = sum(ta[k] < tb[k] for k in ta)
l = sum(ta[k] > tb[k] for k in ta)
return w, len(ta) - w - l, l
def sign_p(w, l):
k, n = min(w, l), w + l
return min(1.0, 2.0 * sum(math.comb(n, i) for i in range(k + 1)) / 2.0 ** n)
ap = {r["label"]: r for r in _load("sweep_aprime.json")}[
"pure+extP+contra+flatanalogmempt+exp+half+close+sub.ratio.derived3.project"]
ch = by["chandrupatla"]
check("base rule vs Chandrupatla by family, APS", families(by[PROJ], ch, "APS"), (6, 1, 8))
check("A' vs Chandrupatla by family, APS", families(ap, ch, "APS"), (8, 1, 6))
check("A' vs Chandrupatla by family, CHA", families(ap, ch, "CHA"), (7, 0, 2))
check("family-level p, APS and CHA (2 digits)",
(float(f"{sign_p(8, 6):.2g}"), float(f"{sign_p(7, 2):.2g}")), (0.79, 0.18))
order = _load("sweep_order.json")
cells = {}
for r in order:
s = r["spec"]
if s[2] == "far":
cells[(s[1], s[3], s[8] if len(s) > 8 else "none")] = r["APS"]["total"] + r["CHA"]["total"]
pairs = [(k[0], k[1]) for k in cells if k[2] == "none" and (k[0], k[1], "order") in cells]
check("far-end reading: measured order cheaper in cells",
(sum(cells[(s_, g, "order")] < cells[(s_, g, "none")] for s_, g in pairs), len(pairs)),
(33, 63))
cap, dire = _load("sweep_cap.json"), _load("sweep_direction.json")
for s, want in (("APS", (3101, 2539)), ("CHA", (1766, 1752))):
bc = min(r[s]["total"] for r in cap if r[s]["solved"] == r[s]["n"])
bd = min(r[s]["total"] for r in dire if r[s]["solved"] == r[s]["n"] and r["spec"][0] == "pure")
check(f"item 9: best capped vs best uncapped, {s}", (bc, bd), want)
itp = _load("sweep_itp.json")
t10 = {"APS": (3767, 3068), "CHA": (1946, 1675), "NEW": (5674, 4707), "RJL": (2161, 1629),
"APP": (3245, 2386), "D": (5721, 4832)}
for s, want in t10.items():
check(f"Table 10 ITP / oracle {s}", (sum(cost(v) for v in itp["itp"][s].values()),
sum(cost(v) for v in itp["itp_oracle"][s].values())), want)
check("Table 10 ITP / oracle over 855", tuple(sum(cost(v) for s in t10 for v in itp[k][s].values())
for k in ("itp", "itp_oracle")), (22514, 18297))
check("ITP bound violations over 855", sum(v[2] for k in ("itp", "itp_oracle")
for s in t10 for v in itp[k][s].values()), 0)
seen, four = _load("sweep_fourth_seen.json"), _load("sweep_fourth_fourth.json")
apx = dict(seen["Aprime"])
apx.update(four["Aprime"])
check("A' ahead of ITP and the oracle on every corpus",
all(sum(cost(v) for v in apx[s].values()) < sum(cost(v) for v in itp[k][s].values())
for s in t10 for k in ("itp", "itp_oracle")), True)
from simroot.pure import pure_root
from stage12_validation import load, per_problem
probs = load()
aps = [p for p in probs if p[0] == "APS"]
runs = {fac: per_problem(lambda f, a, b, xt, mx, _f=fac: pure_root(
f, a, b, xt, mx, similarity="ratio", scale="derived3", guard="project",
budget_factor=_f), aps, 200, criterion="sign") for fac in (1.25, 1.5, 2.0)}
moved = {p: tuple(runs[f][p][0] for f in (1.25, 1.5, 2.0)) for p in runs[2.0]
if len({runs[f][p][0] for f in (1.25, 1.5, 2.0)}) > 1}
check("Table 1a: the one canonical problem the multiplier moves", moved,
{"aps.13.00": (20, 30, 28)})
tot = {}
for sc in ("derived3", "derived3_m"):
pp = per_problem(lambda f, a, b, xt, mx, _s=sc: pure_root(
f, a, b, xt, mx, similarity="ratio", scale=_s, guard="project"), probs, 200,
criterion="sign")
tot[sc] = sum(v[0] for v in pp.values())
check("item 5: phase detector vs base rule, both sets", (tot["derived3_m"], tot["derived3"]),
(5336, 4991))
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()