vvsandClaude Opus 5 f8c17c4ed1 PREREG_flat_stick outcome: NOT accepted. Sticky regime under the projection: CHA 3220 -> 3019 (W1 holds), flat fun3-6 1823 -> 1057 (W4, near pure bisection 1044), guarantee holds (W3), but APS 2806 -> 6781 (W2 fails): the unkept-promise flag enters on 134/154 APS problems and 20/25 non-flat CHA problems, and a false entry now sticks to the end of the run. W6 fails: the order read from the promise is m = inf in 163/174 entries (r >= 1/e; our step is not a pure tangent), so the derived split equals the midpoint on CHA (3019 both). Audit bug fixed and pinned: an infinite |f| at an end made the split nan. Server regression x2: 999 passed, 1 failed = the expected paper-number check. ...

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-09-21 14:14:35 +01:00

..

__init__.py

baseline: the published sim-numerics artifact as it stands (490 tests, verify_article.py checks all 72 paper numbers against sweep_full.json)

2026-09-20 22:38:17 +01:00

baselines.py

Sign tests by product underflowed: FIXED everywhere (branch, not master - the paper is not yet updated). FA * fnew < 0.0 with FA ~ -1e-200, fnew ~ 1e-150 is -0.0 and '-0.0 < 0.0' is False, so on flat functions (x^19) the bracket update moved the wrong end, the root left the bracket and the run still reported convergence - the proposed rule returned 4.9e-9, bisection 3.5e-9, ITP 1.6e-8 with a claimed 1e-12 bracket; the 1e-6 harness scored them solved. Same defect in our bisection, false-position family, Ridders, Brent, ITP and twelve copies in stage scripts, simroot/sim.py and one test; all replaced by _opposite / _same_sign, pinned by test_sign_underflow.

2026-09-21 12:49:01 +01:00

pure.py

PREREG_flat_stick outcome: NOT accepted. Sticky regime under the projection: CHA 3220 -> 3019 (W1 holds), flat fun3-6 1823 -> 1057 (W4, near pure bisection 1044), guarantee holds (W3), but APS 2806 -> 6781 (W2 fails): the unkept-promise flag enters on 134/154 APS problems and 20/25 non-flat CHA problems, and a false entry now sticks to the end of the run. W6 fails: the order read from the promise is m = inf in 163/174 entries (r >= 1/e; our step is not a pure tangent), so the derived split equals the midpoint on CHA (3019 both). Audit bug fixed and pinned: an infinite |f| at an end made the split nan. Server regression x2: 999 passed, 1 failed = the expected paper-number check.

2026-09-21 14:14:35 +01:00

sim.py

Sign tests by product underflowed: FIXED everywhere (branch, not master - the paper is not yet updated). FA * fnew < 0.0 with FA ~ -1e-200, fnew ~ 1e-150 is -0.0 and '-0.0 < 0.0' is False, so on flat functions (x^19) the bracket update moved the wrong end, the root left the bracket and the run still reported convergence - the proposed rule returned 4.9e-9, bisection 3.5e-9, ITP 1.6e-8 with a claimed 1e-12 bracket; the 1e-6 harness scored them solved. Same defect in our bisection, false-position family, Ridders, Brent, ITP and twelve copies in stage scripts, simroot/sim.py and one test; all replaced by _opposite / _same_sign, pinned by test_sign_underflow.

2026-09-21 12:49:01 +01:00