Files
sim-numerics/results_explain_chandrupatla.txt

55 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext

CHA problems: 45 metric: halvings per evaluation = log2(w0/xtol)/nfev (bisection = 1.0)
problem CH nfev CH h/ev gate ok% ours nfev ours h/ev forced%
fun1.1 8 4.983 100.0% 25 1.595 20.0%
fun1.2 12 3.586 55.6% 47 0.916 93.6%
fun1.3 15 3.099 41.7% 50 0.930 94.0%
fun1.4 24 2.256 33.3% 58 0.934 93.1%
fun1.5 44 1.684 17.1% 78 0.950 84.6%
fun2.1 9 4.431 66.7% 12 3.323 25.0%
fun2.2 23 2.311 25.0% 57 0.932 94.7%
fun2.3 29 2.062 19.2% 63 0.949 95.2%
fun2.4 42 1.740 10.3% 77 0.949 77.9%
fun2.5 49 1.627 10.9% 83 0.961 65.1%
fun3.1 44 0.959 0.0% 46 0.917 93.5%
fun3.2 46 0.961 0.0% 48 0.921 93.8%
fun3.3 61 0.888 8.6% 58 0.934 65.5%
fun3.4 69 0.881 13.6% 64 0.950 65.6%
fun3.5 82 0.903 7.6% 58 1.277 1.7%
fun4.1 44 0.959 0.0% 46 0.917 93.5%
fun4.2 46 0.961 0.0% 48 0.921 93.8%
fun4.3 56 0.967 5.7% 58 0.934 75.9%
fun4.4 67 0.907 7.8% 64 0.950 51.6%
fun4.5 80 0.926 5.2% 78 0.950 51.3%
fun5.1 44 0.959 0.0% 46 0.917 93.5%
fun5.2 44 0.970 0.0% 46 0.928 93.5%
fun5.3 45 0.963 0.0% 47 0.922 93.6%
fun5.4 47 0.971 0.0% 49 0.932 93.9%
fun5.5 48 0.972 0.0% 50 0.933 94.0%
fun6.1 44 0.959 0.0% 46 0.917 93.5%
fun6.2 44 0.970 0.0% 46 0.928 93.5%
fun6.3 45 0.963 0.0% 47 0.922 91.5%
fun6.4 47 0.971 0.0% 49 0.932 91.8%
fun6.5 48 0.972 0.0% 50 0.933 92.0%
fun7.1 8 5.273 40.0% 9 4.687 66.7%
fun7.2 8 5.334 40.0% 8 5.334 62.5%
fun7.3 11 3.938 37.5% 10 4.332 70.0%
fun7.4 18 2.536 40.0% 13 3.511 53.8%
fun7.5 19 2.455 43.8% 13 3.588 38.5%
fun8.1 10 4.086 71.4% 44 0.929 93.2%
fun8.2 11 3.768 62.5% 45 0.921 93.3%
fun8.3 13 3.310 60.0% 47 0.916 93.6%
fun8.4 14 3.187 45.5% 48 0.930 93.8%
fun8.5 15 3.080 41.7% 36 1.283 63.9%
fun9.1 8 4.983 100.0% 16 2.491 25.0%
fun9.2 9 4.605 83.3% 45 0.921 93.3%
fun9.3 11 3.912 62.5% 47 0.916 93.6%
fun9.4 13 3.432 60.0% 48 0.930 93.8%
fun9.5 14 3.300 45.5% 50 0.924 94.0%
mirror fidelity: OK
totals (failures charged 200): Chandrupatla 1488, ours 2073
halvings per evaluation: Chandrupatla 2.310, ours 1.422
Chandrupatla accepted the model on 28.0% of steps (the rest it REFUSED and halved)
our safeguard had to repair 77.5% of evaluations