vvsandClaude Opus 5
2357379c2d
Not empty-handed: our own parameter-free reading 'defect' - refuse when |phi - xi| > min(xi, 1 - xi) - sets a new canonical best, APS 2523 at 153/154 (previous 2527, Chandrupatla 2785), guarantee intact (0 of 135 family cells), refusing on 7.0% of steps. It is a second point on the same trade, not a replacement: 5733 over both sets against 5511, because CHA gives back 3210. Also: _shape_ratios crashed on a missing third point, which evaluate would have turned into a silent sweep of zeros; the slope-gate pin was anchored on line spelling; and the server copy had drifted (stale relax/sor.py, test_relaxation.py absent - 746 tests instead of 755). All synced, 92/92 files identical by content, 755 pass on the server. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
398 lines
18 KiB
Python
398 lines
18 KiB
Python
"""Check every number the paper states against sweep_full.json.
|
|
|
|
A paper is a claim about data; transcribing its tables by hand is how a claim
|
|
stops matching its data. A failure here means the paper is wrong, not the
|
|
test.
|
|
|
|
The proposed method is now the CREDIT safeguard - the only configuration with
|
|
no free constant. The projection variant is kept in the paper as the other
|
|
end of a stated trade (better average, one constant), so both are checked.
|
|
"""
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import json
|
|
import os
|
|
import sys
|
|
|
|
from report_sweep import PROPOSED, head_to_head, place, rank
|
|
|
|
FAILS = []
|
|
PROJ = "pure.ratio.derived3.project"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def check(label, got, want):
|
|
ok = got == want
|
|
print(f" {'OK ' if ok else 'BAD'} {label:58s} got {got!r:>16} "
|
|
f"want {want!r}")
|
|
if not ok:
|
|
FAILS.append(label)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def row(rows, setname, lbl):
|
|
return next(r for r in rows if r["label"] == lbl)[setname]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def main():
|
|
with open("sweep_full.json", encoding="utf8") as fh:
|
|
rows = json.load(fh)
|
|
|
|
# Guard against quoting places from a field that is missing a competitor.
|
|
# It has already happened once: before Chandrupatla's own method was
|
|
# added, every ranking assertion here passed only because the method that
|
|
# beats us was absent.
|
|
labels = {r["label"] for r in rows}
|
|
missing = {"chandrupatla", "dekker", PROPOSED} - labels
|
|
if missing:
|
|
print(f" !! THE SWEEP IS STALE: missing {sorted(missing)}. "
|
|
"Re-run sweep_full.py.\n")
|
|
FAILS.append("sweep is stale")
|
|
|
|
check("number of configurations", len(rows), 264)
|
|
|
|
# ---- the proposed method: credit safeguard, no free constant ----------
|
|
print("\nThe proposed method (credit safeguard):")
|
|
check("its label", PROPOSED, "pure.ratio.derived3.credit")
|
|
for setname, pl, tot, sol in (("APS", 29, 3568, 153),
|
|
("CHA", 10, 3020, 40)):
|
|
d = row(rows, setname, PROPOSED)
|
|
check(f"{setname} place", place(rows, setname, PROPOSED), pl)
|
|
check(f"{setname} total", d["total"], tot)
|
|
check(f"{setname} solved", d["solved"], sol)
|
|
check("both sets", row(rows, "APS", PROPOSED)["total"]
|
|
+ row(rows, "CHA", PROPOSED)["total"], 6588)
|
|
|
|
print("\nHead to head of the proposed method:")
|
|
for setname, opp, want in [
|
|
("APS", "chandrupatla", (79, 3, 71)),
|
|
("APS", "toms748", (77, 9, 67)),
|
|
("APS", "brent", (78, 5, 70)),
|
|
("APS", "itp", (103, 10, 40)),
|
|
("APS", "bisection", (122, 1, 30)),
|
|
("CHA", "chandrupatla", (5, 0, 35)),
|
|
("CHA", "toms748", (24, 0, 16)),
|
|
("CHA", "brent", (18, 0, 20)),
|
|
("CHA", "itp", (12, 20, 8))]:
|
|
w, t, l, _ = head_to_head(rows, PROPOSED, opp, setname)
|
|
check(f"{setname} vs {opp}", (w, t, l), want)
|
|
|
|
# ---- the trade against the projection variant -------------------------
|
|
print("\nThe stated trade: credit against the projection variant:")
|
|
check("projection APS", row(rows, "APS", PROJ)["total"], 2806)
|
|
check("projection CHA", row(rows, "CHA", PROJ)["total"], 3220)
|
|
check("projection both", row(rows, "APS", PROJ)["total"]
|
|
+ row(rows, "CHA", PROJ)["total"], 6026)
|
|
check("credit costs more in total",
|
|
(row(rows, "APS", PROPOSED)["total"]
|
|
+ row(rows, "CHA", PROPOSED)["total"])
|
|
> (row(rows, "APS", PROJ)["total"] + row(rows, "CHA", PROJ)["total"]),
|
|
True)
|
|
for setname, opp, want in [("APS", "brent", (102, 11, 40)),
|
|
("APS", "toms748", (86, 16, 51))]:
|
|
w, t, l, _ = head_to_head(rows, PROJ, opp, setname)
|
|
check(f"projection {setname} vs {opp}", (w, t, l), want)
|
|
|
|
# ---- what the earlier, order-destroying guards cost --------------------
|
|
print("\nThe guards that replace the step instead of projecting it:")
|
|
check("APS unguarded", row(rows, "APS", "pure.ratio.derived3.none")["total"],
|
|
2806)
|
|
cha_none = row(rows, "CHA", "pure.ratio.derived3.none")
|
|
check("CHA unguarded total", cha_none["total"], 4104)
|
|
check("CHA unguarded solved", cha_none["solved"], 35)
|
|
check("CHA unguarded bound violations", cha_none["over"], 10)
|
|
check("APS bracket-guard", row(rows, "APS", "pure.ratio.derived3.bracket")["total"],
|
|
7260)
|
|
check("APS both-guard", row(rows, "APS", "pure.ratio.derived3.both")["total"],
|
|
7239)
|
|
|
|
# ---- the field --------------------------------------------------------
|
|
print("\nAlefeld-Potra-Shi:")
|
|
check("APS winner", rank(rows, "APS")[0]["label"], "chandrupatla")
|
|
for lbl, pl, tot in [("chandrupatla", 1, 2785), ("toms748", 4, 2820),
|
|
("brent", 5, 2889), ("dekker", 12, 3158),
|
|
("itp_oracle", 13, 3260), ("ridders", 20, 3313),
|
|
("itp", 34, 3957), ("illinois", 73, 7045),
|
|
("bisection", 79, 7530), ("regula_falsi", 244, 10560)]:
|
|
check(f"APS {lbl} place", place(rows, "APS", lbl), pl)
|
|
check(f"APS {lbl} total", row(rows, "APS", lbl)["total"], tot)
|
|
check("APS regula falsi solved", row(rows, "APS", "regula_falsi")["solved"],
|
|
127)
|
|
|
|
print("\nChandrupatla:")
|
|
top = rank(rows, "CHA")[0]
|
|
check("CHA rank 1 label", top["label"], "pure.sqrt.bracket.project")
|
|
check("CHA rank 1 solves one more than anyone else", top["CHA"]["solved"], 41)
|
|
for lbl, pl, tot in [("chandrupatla", 2, 2423), ("itp_oracle", 3, 2611),
|
|
("itp", 6, 2857), ("bisection", 16, 3090),
|
|
("toms748", 164, 4000), ("brent", 226, 4099)]:
|
|
check(f"CHA {lbl} place", place(rows, "CHA", lbl), pl)
|
|
check(f"CHA {lbl} total", row(rows, "CHA", lbl)["total"], tot)
|
|
check("CHA brent solved", row(rows, "CHA", "brent")["solved"], 38)
|
|
|
|
ours_both = (row(rows, "APS", PROPOSED)["total"]
|
|
+ row(rows, "CHA", PROPOSED)["total"])
|
|
cha_both = (row(rows, "APS", "chandrupatla")["total"]
|
|
+ row(rows, "CHA", "chandrupatla")["total"])
|
|
check("chandrupatla, both sets", cha_both, 5208)
|
|
check("Chandrupatla beats us on both sets", cha_both < ours_both, True)
|
|
|
|
# ---- the regime findings ---------------------------------------------
|
|
print("\nNegative results, the regime claims:")
|
|
check("CHA cbrt over the whole set",
|
|
row(rows, "CHA", "pure.cbrt.derived3.project")["total"], 4099)
|
|
switched = (row(rows, "APS", PROJ)["total"]
|
|
+ row(rows, "CHA", "pure.cbrt.derived3.project")["total"])
|
|
single = row(rows, "APS", PROJ)["total"] + row(rows, "CHA", PROJ)["total"]
|
|
check("single fixed choice, both sets", single, 6026)
|
|
check("switch by benchmark set, both sets", switched, 6905)
|
|
check("switching is worse than not switching", switched > single, True)
|
|
for pid, ours_n, cb_n in (("fun4.1", 89, 32), ("fun4.2", 93, 32),
|
|
("fun4.3", 113, 40), ("fun4.4", 125, 47),
|
|
("fun4.5", 153, 59)):
|
|
o = row(rows, "CHA", PROJ)["per"][pid]
|
|
c = row(rows, "CHA", "pure.cbrt.derived3.project")["per"][pid]
|
|
check(f"{pid} projection variant", o[0], ours_n)
|
|
check(f"{pid} cbrt", c[0], cb_n)
|
|
|
|
# ---- the law across the grid ------------------------------------------
|
|
print("\nThe law across the grid:")
|
|
lin = ("ratio", "rational", "exp_abs")
|
|
quad = ("rat_sq", "exp_sq", "cosine")
|
|
want = {("derived3", "lin"): 6809, ("derived3", "quad"): 22294,
|
|
("derived", "lin"): 6906, ("derived", "quad"): 22167,
|
|
("bracket", "lin"): 10263, ("bracket", "quad"): 19137,
|
|
("start", "lin"): 16102, ("start", "quad"): 15345}
|
|
for scale in ("derived3", "derived", "bracket", "start"):
|
|
for group, gname in ((lin, "lin"), (quad, "quad")):
|
|
tot = cnt = 0
|
|
for r in rows:
|
|
if r["spec"][0] != "pure":
|
|
continue
|
|
_, sim, sc, gu = r["spec"]
|
|
if sc != scale or gu != "step" or sim not in group:
|
|
continue
|
|
cnt += 1
|
|
tot += r["APS"]["total"] + r["CHA"]["total"]
|
|
check(f"mean total, scale={scale}, {gname}",
|
|
round(tot / cnt), want[(scale, gname)])
|
|
|
|
best_by_sim, best_by_scale = {}, {}
|
|
for r in rows:
|
|
if r["spec"][0] != "pure" or r["spec"][3] != "step":
|
|
continue
|
|
t = r["APS"]["total"] + r["CHA"]["total"]
|
|
best_by_sim[r["spec"][1]] = min(best_by_sim.get(r["spec"][1], 10 ** 9), t)
|
|
best_by_scale[r["spec"][2]] = min(best_by_scale.get(r["spec"][2], 10 ** 9), t)
|
|
check("every c=1 similarity beats every c=0 similarity",
|
|
max(best_by_sim[s] for s in lin) < min(best_by_sim[s] for s in quad),
|
|
True)
|
|
check("similarity ranking",
|
|
[s for s, _ in sorted(best_by_sim.items(), key=lambda kv: kv[1])],
|
|
["ratio", "exp_abs", "rational", "ratio_soft", "sqrt", "cbrt",
|
|
"exp_sq", "rat_sq", "cosine"])
|
|
for sim, v in [("ratio", 6496), ("exp_abs", 6822), ("rational", 7038),
|
|
("ratio_soft", 9502), ("sqrt", 10497), ("cbrt", 11941),
|
|
("exp_sq", 14314), ("rat_sq", 15102), ("cosine", 16394)]:
|
|
check(f"similarity {sim} best", best_by_sim[sim], v)
|
|
check("scale ranking",
|
|
[s for s, _ in sorted(best_by_scale.items(), key=lambda kv: kv[1])],
|
|
["derived3", "derived", "bracket", "start"])
|
|
for sc, v in [("derived3", 6496), ("derived", 6628), ("bracket", 9081),
|
|
("start", 14540)]:
|
|
check(f"scale {sc} best", best_by_scale[sc], v)
|
|
|
|
verify_placement_modes()
|
|
verify_per_place()
|
|
verify_decision_place()
|
|
|
|
print()
|
|
if FAILS:
|
|
print(f"{len(FAILS)} STATED NUMBERS DO NOT MATCH THE DATA:")
|
|
for f in FAILS:
|
|
print(f" {f}")
|
|
sys.exit(1)
|
|
print("every number stated in the paper matches the sweep data.")
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Section "where the similarity is read" (PREREGs of 2026-09-20/21). Each new
|
|
# grid lives in its OWN sweep file so the published sweep_full.json stays the
|
|
# artefact of the original claims; every number the new section quotes is
|
|
# re-checked here against that file.
|
|
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
PLACEMENT = {
|
|
# file label APS CHA
|
|
"sweep_slope.json": ("slope.ratio.derived3.project", 2848, 3074),
|
|
"sweep_points.json": ("pure+shape+slope.ratio.derived3.safe", 2527, 3108),
|
|
"sweep_direction.json": ("pure+dissim+slope.ratio.derived3.project", 2726, 2785),
|
|
"sweep_combo.json": ("pure+shape+dissim+slope.ratio.derived3.safe", 2884, 2859),
|
|
"sweep_gate.json": ("gate.ratio.derived.project", 4449, 2991),
|
|
"sweep_log.json": ("log.ratio_soft.derived.safe", 6940, 3474),
|
|
}
|
|
# The per-place table of section "the similarity function belongs to the place":
|
|
# seven PAIRED comparisons in sweep_order.json. Checked as pairs, because a pair is
|
|
# what the pre-registration licensed and a single cell would prove nothing.
|
|
ORDER_PAIRS = {
|
|
# guard (APS m=1, APS measured, CHA m=1, CHA measured)
|
|
"both": (4522, 3675, 3387, 3216),
|
|
"bracket": (4606, 3542, 3571, 3303),
|
|
"credit": (5190, 4686, 3013, 2884),
|
|
"project": (6932, 6364, 4794, 4559),
|
|
"safe": (5987, 5229, 4108, 3923),
|
|
"step": (6435, 5551, 4257, 4022),
|
|
"none": (10676, 10043, 8265, 7794),
|
|
}
|
|
# the negative item: the order does not cure false position
|
|
ORDER_FALSEPOS = {("rational", "far", "none", "none"): (127, 10676),
|
|
("rational", "far", "none", "order"): (128, 10043)}
|
|
# and the harmful direction, quoted in the same subsection
|
|
ORDER_SLOPE_HARM = {("ratio", "derived3", "none", "none"): 2806,
|
|
("ratio", "derived3", "none", "order"): 2854}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def verify_per_place():
|
|
print("\nThe per-place reading (sweep_order.json):")
|
|
if not os.path.exists("sweep_order.json"):
|
|
print(" !! sweep_order.json absent — section 'belongs to the place' unverifiable")
|
|
FAILS.append("missing sweep_order.json")
|
|
return
|
|
with open("sweep_order.json", encoding="utf8") as fh:
|
|
rows = json.load(fh)
|
|
|
|
def cell(sim, sc, gu, ex):
|
|
for r in rows:
|
|
s = r["spec"]
|
|
if (s[1], s[2], s[3], s[8] if len(s) > 8 else "none") == (sim, sc, gu, ex):
|
|
return r
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
cheaper = 0
|
|
for gu, (a1, a2, c1, c2) in ORDER_PAIRS.items():
|
|
p = cell("rational", "far", gu, "none")
|
|
q = cell("rational", "far", gu, "order")
|
|
if p is None or q is None:
|
|
FAILS.append(f"order pair {gu} missing from sweep_order.json")
|
|
print(f" !! pair {gu} missing — stale sweep")
|
|
continue
|
|
check(f"far+rational {gu} APS m=1", p["APS"]["total"], a1)
|
|
check(f"far+rational {gu} APS order", q["APS"]["total"], a2)
|
|
check(f"far+rational {gu} CHA m=1", p["CHA"]["total"], c1)
|
|
check(f"far+rational {gu} CHA order", q["CHA"]["total"], c2)
|
|
cheaper += (q["APS"]["total"] + q["CHA"]["total"]
|
|
< p["APS"]["total"] + p["CHA"]["total"])
|
|
check("cheaper in 7 of 7 safeguards", cheaper, 7)
|
|
for (sim, sc, gu, ex), (solved, total) in ORDER_FALSEPOS.items():
|
|
r = cell(sim, sc, gu, ex)
|
|
if r is None:
|
|
FAILS.append(f"false-position cell {ex} missing")
|
|
continue
|
|
check(f"false position {ex} solved", r["APS"]["solved"], solved)
|
|
check(f"false position {ex} APS", r["APS"]["total"], total)
|
|
for (sim, sc, gu, ex), want in ORDER_SLOPE_HARM.items():
|
|
r = cell(sim, sc, gu, ex)
|
|
if r is None:
|
|
FAILS.append(f"slope-harm cell {ex} missing")
|
|
continue
|
|
check(f"slope reading {ex} APS", r["APS"]["total"], want)
|
|
fam = [r for r in rows if r["spec"][3] in ("project", "safe", "credit")]
|
|
check("guarantee family violations", sum(r["APS"]["over"] + r["CHA"]["over"]
|
|
for r in fam), 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECISION_CELLS = {
|
|
# (similarity, prestep, guard): {set: total}
|
|
("ratio", "band", "project"): {"APS": 5432, "CHA": 3066},
|
|
("ratio", "band", "credit"): {"CHA": 2899},
|
|
("ratio", "none", "project"): {"APS": 2806},
|
|
("ratio", "defect", "project"): {"APS": 2523, "CHA": 3210},
|
|
("ratio_soft", "simpair", "project"): {"CHA": 2868},
|
|
}
|
|
DECISION_RATES = {"band": 63.6, "defect": 7.0}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def verify_decision_place():
|
|
print("\nThe decision place (sweep_decision.json):")
|
|
if not os.path.exists("sweep_decision.json"):
|
|
print(" !! sweep_decision.json absent — section 'decision place' unverifiable")
|
|
FAILS.append("missing sweep_decision.json")
|
|
return
|
|
with open("sweep_decision.json", encoding="utf8") as fh:
|
|
rows = json.load(fh)
|
|
by = {(r["spec"][1], r["spec"][5], r["spec"][3]): r for r in rows}
|
|
for k, sets in DECISION_CELLS.items():
|
|
r = by.get(k)
|
|
if r is None:
|
|
FAILS.append(f"decision cell {k} missing")
|
|
print(f" !! {k} missing — stale sweep")
|
|
continue
|
|
for setname, want in sets.items():
|
|
check(f"{'.'.join(k)} {setname}", r[setname]["total"], want)
|
|
d = by[("ratio", "defect", "project")]
|
|
check("defect APS solved", d["APS"]["solved"], 153)
|
|
check("defect both sets", d["APS"]["total"] + d["CHA"]["total"], 5733)
|
|
check("defect is the new canonical best (< 2527)", d["APS"]["total"] < 2527, True)
|
|
fam = [r for r in rows if r["spec"][3] in ("project", "safe", "credit")]
|
|
check("decision grid guarantee violations", sum(r["APS"]["over"] + r["CHA"]["over"]
|
|
for r in fam), 0)
|
|
# the refusal rates are recomputed, not transcribed
|
|
from scipy.optimize._tstutils import _APS_TESTS_DICTS, _CHANDRUPATLA_TESTS_DICTS
|
|
from simroot.pure import pure_root
|
|
probs = [(float(q["bracket"][0]), float(q["bracket"][1]),
|
|
(lambda ff, aa: lambda t: ff(t, *aa))(q["f"], q.get("args", ())))
|
|
for q in _APS_TESTS_DICTS]
|
|
probs += [(float(q["bracket"][0]), float(q["bracket"][1]),
|
|
(lambda ff: lambda t: ff(t))(q["f"])) for q in _CHANDRUPATLA_TESTS_DICTS]
|
|
for mode, want in DECISION_RATES.items():
|
|
ref = nfev = 0
|
|
for a, b, f in probs:
|
|
st = {}
|
|
try:
|
|
_x, n, _c = pure_root(f, a, b, 1e-12, 200, similarity="ratio",
|
|
scale="derived3", guard="project", prestep=mode,
|
|
stats=st)
|
|
except Exception:
|
|
continue
|
|
ref += st.get("pre_refused", 0)
|
|
nfev += int(n)
|
|
check(f"{mode} refusal rate %", round(100.0 * ref / nfev, 1), want)
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLACEMENT_PER_SET = {
|
|
"sweep_direction.json": ("CHA", "pure+dissim+slope.ratio.derived3.safe", 2683),
|
|
"sweep_gate.json": ("CHA", "gate.ratio_soft.derived.safe", 2851),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def verify_placement_modes():
|
|
print("\nThe placement modes (each in its own sweep file):")
|
|
for path, (lbl, aps, cha) in PLACEMENT.items():
|
|
if not os.path.exists(path):
|
|
print(f" !! {path} absent — the section quoting it cannot be verified")
|
|
FAILS.append(f"missing {path}")
|
|
continue
|
|
with open(path, encoding="utf8") as fh:
|
|
rows = json.load(fh)
|
|
try:
|
|
d = next(r for r in rows if r["label"] == lbl)
|
|
except StopIteration:
|
|
print(f" !! {lbl} not in {path} — stale sweep")
|
|
FAILS.append(f"{lbl} missing from {path}")
|
|
continue
|
|
check(f"{lbl} APS", d["APS"]["total"], aps)
|
|
check(f"{lbl} CHA", d["CHA"]["total"], cha)
|
|
check(f"{lbl} solved", d["APS"]["solved"] + d["CHA"]["solved"], 193)
|
|
check(f"{lbl} guarantee (over 2x)", d["APS"]["over"] + d["CHA"]["over"], 0)
|
|
for path, (setname, lbl, want) in PLACEMENT_PER_SET.items():
|
|
if not os.path.exists(path):
|
|
continue
|
|
with open(path, encoding="utf8") as fh:
|
|
rows = json.load(fh)
|
|
d = next((r for r in rows if r["label"] == lbl), None)
|
|
if d is None:
|
|
FAILS.append(f"{lbl} missing from {path}")
|
|
continue
|
|
check(f"{lbl} {setname} per-set", d[setname]["total"], want)
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|
main()
|